mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Verifiable Dot to Reward Chain: Harnessing Verifiable Reference-based Rewards for Reinforcement Learning of Open-ended Generation

arXiv 2601.18533 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) succeeds in reasoning tasks (e.g., math and code) by checking the final verifiable answer (i.e., a verifiable dot signal). However, extending this paradigm to open-ended generation is challenging because there is no unambiguous ground truth. Relying on single-dot supervision often leads to inefficiency and reward hacking. To address these issues, we propose reinforcement learning with verifiable reference-based rewards (RLVRR). Instead of checking the final answer, RLVRR extracts an ordered linguistic signal from high-quality references (i.e, reward chain). Specifically, RLVRR decomposes rewards into two dimensions: content, which preserves deterministic core concepts (e.g., keywords), and style, which evaluates adherence to stylistic properties through LLM-based verification. In this way, RLVRR combines the exploratory strength of RL with the efficiency and reliability of supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Extensive experiments on more than 10 benchmarks with Qwen and Llama models confirm the advantages of our approach. RLVRR (1) substantially outperforms SFT trained with ten times more data and advanced reward models, (2) unifies the training of structured reasoning and open-ended generation, and (3) generalizes more effectively while preserving output diversity. These results establish RLVRR as a principled and efficient path toward verifiable reinforcement learning for general-purpose LLM alignment. We release our code and data at https://github.com/YJiangcm/RLVRR.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.

Builds on

41 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Writing-Zero: Bridge the Gap Between Non-verifiable Tasks and Verifiable Rewards30 May
  2. 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains31 Mar

Other references · 39

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  7. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  9. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  10. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  11. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  12. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
27 more
  1. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  2. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  3. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  4. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
  5. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  6. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  7. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
  8. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
  9. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  10. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
  11. 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 505
  12. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 480
  13. 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 341
  14. 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
  15. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
  16. 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergycited by 204
  17. 2024MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 144
  18. 2024ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHFcited by 133
  19. 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domainscited by 132
  20. 2019Bridging the Gap between Training and Inference for Neural Machine Translationcited by 123
  21. 2019Generalization in Generation: A closer look at Exposure Biascited by 123
  22. 2023FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 112
  23. 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifierscited by 83
  24. 2024MARIO: MAth Reasoning with code Interpreter Output -- A Reproducible Pipelinecited by 81
  25. 2025Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifierscited by 76
  26. 2025BLEUBERI: BLEU is a surprisingly effective reward for instruction followingcited by 17
  27. 2025Instruction-Tuning Data Synthesis from Scratch via Web Reconstructioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Extending RLVR to Open-Ended Tasks via Verifiable Multiple-Choice Reformulation
  2. 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
  3. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
  4. 2026From RLVR to RLSVR: Task Transformation Induces Self-Verifiable Rewards for Open-Ended LLM Self-Improvement
  5. 2026When Do Intrinsic Rewards Work for Code Reasoning? A Comprehensive Study
  6. 2026Delay, Plateau, or Collapse: Evaluating the Impact of Systematic Verification Error on RLVR
  7. 2025A Simple "Motivation" Can Enhance Reinforcement Finetuning of Large Reasoning Models
  8. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Anchors