From Verifiable Dot to Reward Chain: Harnessing Verifiable Reference-based Rewards for Reinforcement Learning of Open-ended Generation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) succeeds in reasoning tasks (e.g., math and code) by checking the final verifiable answer (i.e., a verifiable dot signal). However, extending this paradigm to open-ended generation is challenging because there is no unambiguous ground truth. Relying on single-dot supervision often leads to inefficiency and reward hacking. To address these issues, we propose reinforcement learning with verifiable reference-based rewards (RLVRR). Instead of checking the final answer, RLVRR extracts an ordered linguistic signal from high-quality references (i.e, reward chain). Specifically, RLVRR decomposes rewards into two dimensions: content, which preserves deterministic core concepts (e.g., keywords), and style, which evaluates adherence to stylistic properties through LLM-based verification. In this way, RLVRR combines the exploratory strength of RL with the efficiency and reliability of supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Extensive experiments on more than 10 benchmarks with Qwen and Llama models confirm the advantages of our approach. RLVRR (1) substantially outperforms SFT trained with ten times more data and advanced reward models, (2) unifies the training of structured reasoning and open-ended generation, and (3) generalizes more effectively while preserving output diversity. These results establish RLVRR as a principled and efficient path toward verifiable reinforcement learning for general-purpose LLM alignment. We release our code and data at https://github.com/YJiangcm/RLVRR.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 41 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.
Builds on
41 of 55 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Writing-Zero: Bridge the Gap Between Non-verifiable Tasks and Verifiable Rewards30 May
- 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains31 Mar
Other references · 39
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
27 more
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 505
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 480
- 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 341
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergycited by 204
- 2024MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 144
- 2024ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHFcited by 133
- 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domainscited by 132
- 2019Bridging the Gap between Training and Inference for Neural Machine Translationcited by 123
- 2019Generalization in Generation: A closer look at Exposure Biascited by 123
- 2023FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 112
- 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifierscited by 83
- 2024MARIO: MAth Reasoning with code Interpreter Output -- A Reproducible Pipelinecited by 81
- 2025Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifierscited by 76
- 2025BLEUBERI: BLEU is a surprisingly effective reward for instruction followingcited by 17
- 2025Instruction-Tuning Data Synthesis from Scratch via Web Reconstructioncited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Why GRPO Needs Normalization: A Local-Curvature Perspective on Adaptive Gradientscited by 4
- 2026QUBRIC: Co-Designing Queries and Rubrics for RL Beyond Verifiable Rewardscited by 1
- 2026ConSteer-RL: Steering Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Confidence-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026EvoOptiGraph: Weakness-Driven Coevolution via Graph-Based Structural Generation for Optimization Modelingcited by 0
- 2026EvoOptiGraph: Weakness-Driven Coevolution via Graph-Based Structural Generation for Optimization Modeling25 Jun 2026
- 2026ConSteer-RL: Steering Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Confidence-Aware Reinforcement Learning6 Jun 2026
- 2026QUBRIC: Co-Designing Queries and Rubrics for RL Beyond Verifiable Rewards2 Jun 2026
- 2026Why GRPO Needs Normalization: A Local-Curvature Perspective on Adaptive Gradients30 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Extending RLVR to Open-Ended Tasks via Verifiable Multiple-Choice Reformulation
- 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
- 2026From RLVR to RLSVR: Task Transformation Induces Self-Verifiable Rewards for Open-Ended LLM Self-Improvement
- 2026When Do Intrinsic Rewards Work for Code Reasoning? A Comprehensive Study
- 2026Delay, Plateau, or Collapse: Evaluating the Impact of Systematic Verification Error on RLVR
- 2025A Simple "Motivation" Can Enhance Reinforcement Finetuning of Large Reasoning Models
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Anchors