mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

URPO: A Unified Reward & Policy Optimization Framework for Large Language Models

arXiv 2507.17515 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2025cs.CV cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale alignment pipelines typically pair a policy model with a separately trained reward model whose parameters remain frozen during reinforcement learning (RL). This separation creates a complex, resource-intensive pipeline and suffers from a performance ceiling due to a static reward signal. We propose a novel framework, Unified Reward & Policy Optimization (URPO), that unifies instruction-following ("player") and reward modeling ("referee") within a single model and a single training phase. Our method recasts all alignment data-including preference pairs, verifiable reasoning, and open-ended instructions-into a unified generative format optimized by a single Group-Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) loop. This enables the model to learn from ground-truth preferences and verifiable logic while simultaneously generating its own rewards for open-ended tasks. Experiments on the Qwen2.5-7B model demonstrate URPO's superiority. Our unified model significantly outperforms a strong baseline using a separate generative reward model, boosting the instruction-following score on AlpacaEval from 42.24 to 44.84 and the composite reasoning average from 32.66 to 35.66. Furthermore, URPO cultivates a superior internal evaluator as a byproduct of training, achieving a RewardBench score of 85.15 and surpassing the dedicated reward model it replaces (83.55). By eliminating the need for a separate reward model and fostering a co-evolutionary dynamic between generation and evaluation, URPO presents a simpler, more efficient, and more effective path towards robustly aligned language models.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 34 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2025.

Builds on

34 of 39 references.

References · 34

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  6. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  7. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  8. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  9. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  10. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  11. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  12. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
22 more
  1. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  4. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  5. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
  6. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  7. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  8. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  9. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  10. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
  11. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
  12. 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 377
  13. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 327
  14. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 239
  15. 2025Learning to Reason without External Rewardscited by 210
  16. 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
  17. 2025Skywork Open Reasoner 1 Technical Reportcited by 165
  18. 2025OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scalingcited by 113
  19. 2024Self-Alignment for Factuality: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Self-Evaluationcited by 80
  20. 2025Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifierscited by 77
  21. 2025HelpSteer3-Preference: Open Human-Annotated Preference Data across Diverse Tasks and Languagescited by 75
  22. 2024RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignmentcited by 61

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A First-Order Logic-Based Alternative to Reward Models in RLHF
  2. 2026LambdaPO: A Lambda Style Policy Optimization for Reasoning Language Models
  3. 2025COPO: Consistency-Aware Policy Optimization
  4. 2026A Unified Pair-GRPO Family: From Implicit to Explicit Preference Constraints for Stable and General RL Alignment
  5. 2026UniRRM: Unified Reasoning Reward Models Across Languages and Evaluation Paradigms
  6. 2025Beyond Monolithic Rewards: A Hybrid and Multi-Aspect Reward Optimization for MLLM Alignment
  7. 2025λ-GRPO: Unifying the GRPO Frameworks with Learnable Token Preferences
  8. 2025AWPO: Enhancing Tool-Use of Large Language Models through Adaptive Integration of Reasoning Rewards