ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a standard paradigm for refining large language models (LLMs) beyond pre-training and instruction tuning. A prominent line of work is RL with verifiable rewards (RLVR), which leverages automatically verifiable outcomes (e.g., correctness or executability) to generate reward signals. While efficient, this framework faces two key limitations: First, its binary feedback is too sparse to capture the quality of the reasoning process. Second, its coarse-grained rewards potentially lead to vanishing gradients. Inspired by observations from human learning, we introduce a RL technique that integrates verifiable outcomes with the model's own confidence estimates. This joint design enriches the reward signal, providing finer-grained feedback and implicitly supervising the reasoning process. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method enhances RL performance across multiple datasets and reduces token consumption during inference, while incurring negligible additional training cost. Moreover, it can be used as a plug-in module to enhance other state-of-the-art RL methods.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.
Builds on
20 of 23 references.
References · 20
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
8 more
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 835
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 559
- 2022CodeRL: Mastering Code Generation through Pretrained Models and Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 358
- 2025Learning to Reason without External Rewardscited by 210
- 2025Maximizing Confidence Alone Improves Reasoningcited by 100
- 2025Rewarding Doubt: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Calibrated Confidence Expression of Large Language Modelscited by 52
- 2025Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models with Self-Consistency-Based Hallucination Detectioncited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026SCALER:Synthetic Scalable Adaptive Learning Environment for Reasoningcited by 8
- 2026QUATRO: Query-Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization for LLM Fine-tuningcited by 3
- 2026Abstention as an Action Can Kill Both the Reward Gradient and the KL Anchor: Collapse Law and Repair for Error-Penalized Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2026KARL: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Knowledge-Boundary-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2025Every Question Has Its Own Value: Reinforcement Learning with Explicit Human Valuescited by 1
- 2026Abstention as an Action Can Kill Both the Reward Gradient and the KL Anchor: Collapse Law and Repair for Error-Penalized Reinforcement Learning31 Jul 2026
- 2026KARL: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Knowledge-Boundary-Aware Reinforcement Learning3 Apr 2026
- 2026QUATRO: Query-Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization for LLM Fine-tuning4 Feb 2026
- 2026SCALER:Synthetic Scalable Adaptive Learning Environment for Reasoning8 Jan 2026
- 2025Every Question Has Its Own Value: Reinforcement Learning with Explicit Human Values23 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Extending RLVR to Open-Ended Tasks via Verifiable Multiple-Choice Reformulation
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
- 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers
- 2025A Simple "Motivation" Can Enhance Reinforcement Finetuning of Large Reasoning Models
- 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains
- 2026ConSteer-RL: Steering Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Confidence-Aware Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?
- 2026From RLVR to RLSVR: Task Transformation Induces Self-Verifiable Rewards for Open-Ended LLM Self-Improvement