mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DWT-Fusion: A Signal-Based Framework for Training-Free LLM-Generated Text Detection

arXiv 2607.22026 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting LLM-generated text remains challenging under zero-shot and training-free conditions, especially when detectors must generalize across datasets, domains, and unseen generators. While existing training-free approaches exploit language-model statistics as detection signals, they typically characterize a text through global measures that summarize overall model behavior. Consequently, potentially informative local and multiscale variations in token-level predictability may remain underutilized. Motivated by this observation, we introduce DWT-Fusion, a training-free signal-based framework for detecting LLM-generated text using discrete wavelet analysis of token-level log-probability sequences produced by a proxy causal language model. The proposed framework analyzes these sequences through wavelet-based multiresolution signal representations and derives detection signals from localized probability dynamics. We further evaluate four training-free voting variants, including equal-weight hard voting, equal-weight soft voting, calibration-weighted hard voting, and calibration-weighted soft voting, to combine multiple wavelet configurations without training a supervised meta-classifier. We evaluate the framework on HC3, M4, and MAGE using GPT-Neo-2.7B, GPT-J-6B, Falcon-7B, and LLaMA-3-8B as proxy models. The best single wavelet configurations achieve AUROC values of 0.9872, 0.8185, and 0.7138 on HC3, M4, and MAGE, respectively. With calibration-weighted voting, the best ensemble variants further improve AUROC to 0.9919, 0.8477, and 0.7471. These findings show that DWT-based multiresolution scoring and calibration-guided voting fusion provide effective and interpretable signals for training-free LLM-generated text detection.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.

Builds on

25 of 36 references.

References · 25

  1. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  2. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  3. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  4. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
  5. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
  6. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
  7. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 129
  8. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 121
  9. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 105
  10. 2023Ghostbuster: Detecting Text Ghostwritten by Large Language Modelscited by 91
  11. 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 71
  12. 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 53
13 more
  1. 2024Training-free LLM-generated Text Detection by Mining Token Probability Sequencescited by 35
  2. 2024Who Wrote This? The Key to Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection Is GECScorecited by 27
  3. 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methodscited by 23
  4. 2025AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical Guaranteescited by 21
  5. 2024Learning to Rewrite: Generalized LLM-Generated Text Detectioncited by 13
  6. 2025DETree: DEtecting Human-AI Collaborative Texts via Tree-Structured Hierarchical Representation Learningcited by 12
  7. 2025DivScore: Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text in Specialized Domainscited by 9
  8. 2025Human Texts Are Outliers: Detecting LLM-generated Texts via Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 8
  9. 2025Decoupling Content and Expression: Two-Dimensional Detection of AI-Generated Textcited by 6
  10. 2025SpecDetect: Simple, Fast, and Training-Free Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Spectral Analysiscited by 6
  11. 2025FDLLM: A Dedicated Detector for Black-Box LLMs Fingerprintingcited by 4
  12. 2026WaveDetect: Robust Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection via Wavelet Transformcited by 2
  13. 2025Towards Structurally Explainable Machine-Generated Text Detection: A Graph-Perspective Frameworkcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RepreGuard: Detecting LLM-Generated Text by Revealing Hidden Representation Patterns
  2. 2026LLM Self-Recognition: Steering and Retrieving Activation Signatures
  3. 2023From Text to Source: Results in Detecting Large Language Model-Generated Content
  4. 2026Steer-to-Detect: Probing Hidden Representations for Detection of LLM-Generated Texts
  5. 2026Detecting LLM-Generated Text with Performance Guarantees
  6. 2025Increasing the Robustness of the Fine-tuned Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectors
  7. 2023Divergent Token Metrics: Measuring degradation to prune away LLM components -- and optimize quantization
  8. 2026Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Model