mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Synthesising Counterfactual Explanations via Label-Conditional Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoders

arXiv 2510.04855 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Counterfactual explanations (CEs) provide recourse recommendations for individuals affected by algorithmic decisions. A key challenge is generating CEs that are robust against various perturbation types (e.g. input and model perturbations) while simultaneously satisfying other desirable properties. These include plausibility, ensuring CEs reside on the data manifold, and diversity, providing multiple distinct recourse options for single inputs. Existing methods, however, mostly struggle to address these multifaceted requirements in a unified, model-agnostic manner. We address these limitations by proposing a novel generative framework. First, we introduce the Label-conditional Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoder (L-GMVAE), a model trained to learn a structured latent space where each class label is represented by a set of Gaussian components with diverse, prototypical centroids. Building on this, we present LAPACE (LAtent PAth Counterfactual Explanations), a model-agnostic algorithm that synthesises entire paths of CE points by interpolating from inputs' latent representations to those learned latent centroids. This approach inherently ensures robustness to input changes, as all paths for a given target class converge to the same fixed centroids. Furthermore, the generated paths provide a spectrum of recourse options, allowing users to navigate the trade-off between proximity and plausibility while also encouraging robustness against model changes. In addition, user-specified actionability constraints can also be easily incorporated via lightweight gradient optimisation through the L-GMVAE's decoder. Comprehensive experiments show that LAPACE is computationally efficient and achieves competitive performance across eight quantitative metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.

Builds on

36 of 55 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  2. 2015Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysiscited by 763
  3. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  4. 2014Semi-Supervised Learning with Deep Generative Modelscited by 494
  5. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  6. 2016Deep Unsupervised Clustering with Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoderscited by 219
  7. 2020Deep Structural Causal Models for Tractable Counterfactual Inferencecited by 210
  8. 2020Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanationscited by 157
  9. 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
  10. 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 143
  11. 2020Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachcited by 139
  12. 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 101
24 more
  1. 2021CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithmscited by 85
  2. 2017Interpretable Predictions of Tree-based Ensembles via Actionable Feature Tweakingcited by 76
  3. 2020On Counterfactual Explanations under Predictive Multiplicitycited by 73
  4. 2020Weakly Supervised Disentangled Generative Causal Representation Learningcited by 67
  5. 2021NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanationscited by 62
  6. 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic Recoursecited by 56
  7. 2023High Fidelity Image Counterfactuals with Probabilistic Causal Modelscited by 53
  8. 2022Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based Ensemblescited by 49
  9. 2021Evaluating Robustness of Counterfactual Explanationscited by 41
  10. 2021A Survey on the Robustness of Feature Importance and Counterfactual Explanationscited by 38
  11. 2023Measuring axiomatic soundness of counterfactual image modelscited by 34
  12. 2024Robust Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 29
  13. 2022Formalising the Robustness of Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networkscited by 24
  14. 2020Scaling Guarantees for Nearest Counterfactual Explanationscited by 22
  15. 2025Beyond the convexity assumption: Realistic tabular data generation under quantifier-free real linear constraintscited by 18
  16. 2023Promoting Counterfactual Robustness through Diversitycited by 17
  17. 2023Recourse under Model Multiplicity via Argumentative Ensembling (Technical Report)cited by 15
  18. 2025A Survey on Deep Learning Approaches for Tabular Data Generation: Utility, Alignment, Fidelity, Privacy, Diversity, and Beyondcited by 13
  19. 2023Achieving Diversity in Counterfactual Explanations: a Review and Discussioncited by 11
  20. 2024Probabilistically Plausible Counterfactual Explanations with Normalizing Flowscited by 11
  21. 2024Counterfactual Generative Modeling with Variational Causal Inferencecited by 10
  22. 2024Interval Abstractions for Robust Counterfactual Explanationscited by 7
  23. 2024Counterfactual Metarules for Local and Global Recoursecited by 7
  24. 2025RobustX: Robust Counterfactual Explanations Made Easycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.