SEGA: A Transferable Signed Ensemble Gaussian Black-Box Attack against No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) models play an important role in various real-world applications. Recently, adversarial attacks against NR-IQA models have attracted increasing attention, as they provide valuable insights for revealing model vulnerabilities and guiding robust system design. Some effective attacks have been proposed against NR-IQA models in white-box settings, where the attacker has full access to the target model. However, these attacks often suffer from poor transferability to unknown target models in more realistic black-box scenarios, where the target model is inaccessible. This work makes the first attempt to address the challenge of low transferability in attacking NR-IQA models by proposing a transferable Signed Ensemble Gaussian black-box Attack (SEGA). The main idea is to approximate the gradient of the target model by applying Gaussian smoothing to source models and ensembling their smoothed gradients. To ensure the imperceptibility of adversarial perturbations, SEGA further removes inappropriate perturbations using a specially designed perturbation filter mask. Experimental results on the CLIVE dataset demonstrate the superior transferability of SEGA, validating its effectiveness in enabling successful transfer-based black-box attacks against NR-IQA models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.
Builds on
45 of 75 references.
References · 45
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,081
- 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 811
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
- 2022MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 522
- 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 446
33 more
- 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 355
- 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
- 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 302
- 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 280
- 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 225
- 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
- 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 209
- 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 166
- 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 158
- 2017The Shattered Gradients Problem: If resnets are the answer, then what is the question?cited by 157
- 2017RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 151
- 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
- 2017On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attackscited by 126
- 2016Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approachcited by 71
- 2019A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of Gradient Approximations in Derivative-Free Optimizationcited by 68
- 2020SurFree: a fast surrogate-free black-box attackcited by 60
- 2020Perturbing Across the Feature Hierarchy to Improve Standard and Strict Blackbox Attack Transferabilitycited by 57
- 2020Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 54
- 2018Understanding and Enhancing the Transferability of Adversarial Examplescited by 41
- 2021Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 36
- 2022Perceptual Attacks of No-Reference Image Quality Models with Human-in-the-Loopcited by 30
- 2024S-NeRF++: Autonomous Driving Simulation via Neural Reconstruction and Generationcited by 28
- 2020Active Fine-Tuning from gMAD Examples Improves Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 24
- 2023BlackboxBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 21
- 2022Universal Perturbation Attack on Differentiable No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metricscited by 17
- 2023Image Quality-aware Diagnosis via Meta-knowledge Co-embeddingcited by 12
- 2022A Quality Index Metric and Method for Online Self-Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles Sensory Perceptioncited by 10
- 2024Exploring Vulnerabilities of No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Models: A Query-Based Black-Box Methodcited by 10
- 2021Adversarial Attack and Defense in Deep Rankingcited by 8
- 2024Black-box Adversarial Attacks Against Image Quality Assessment Modelscited by 8
- 2024Defense Against Adversarial Attacks on No-Reference Image Quality Models with Gradient Norm Regularizationcited by 7
- 2024Adversarial purification for no-reference image-quality metrics: applicability study and new methodscited by 5
- 2024IOI: Invisible One-Iteration Adversarial Attack on No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metricscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.