mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality Assessment

arXiv 2008.03889 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2020eess.IV cs.CV cs.MMcited by 54

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Currently, most image quality assessment (IQA) models are supervised by the MAE or MSE loss with empirically slow convergence. It is well-known that normalization can facilitate fast convergence. Therefore, we explore normalization in the design of loss functions for IQA. Specifically, we first normalize the predicted quality scores and the corresponding subjective quality scores. Then, the loss is defined based on the norm of the differences between these normalized values. The resulting "Norm-in-Norm'' loss encourages the IQA model to make linear predictions with respect to subjective quality scores. After training, the least squares regression is applied to determine the linear mapping from the predicted quality to the subjective quality. It is shown that the new loss is closely connected with two common IQA performance criteria (PLCC and RMSE). Through theoretical analysis, it is proved that the embedded normalization makes the gradients of the loss function more stable and more predictable, which is conducive to the faster convergence of the IQA model. Furthermore, to experimentally verify the effectiveness of the proposed loss, it is applied to solve a challenging problem: quality assessment of in-the-wild images. Experiments on two relevant datasets (KonIQ-10k and CLIVE) show that, compared to MAE or MSE loss, the new loss enables the IQA model to converge about 10 times faster and the final model achieves better performance. The proposed model also achieves state-of-the-art prediction performance on this challenging problem. For reproducible scientific research, our code is publicly available at https://github.com/lidq92/LinearityIQA.

Key facts. Cited by 54 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 14; 2023: 9; 2024: 14; 2025: 11; 2026: 3.

54 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 315
  2. 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 278
  3. 2022Neighbourhood Representative Sampling for Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessmentcited by 50
  4. 2024Towards A Better Metric for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 50
  5. 2022DisCoVQA: Temporal Distortion-Content Transformers for Video Quality Assessmentcited by 41
  6. 2022NTIRE 2022 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 41
  7. 2021Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 36
  8. 2022Video compression dataset and benchmark of learning-based video-quality metricscited by 27
  9. 2023Exploring the Naturalness of AI-Generated Imagescited by 22
  10. 2022Universal Perturbation Attack on Differentiable No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metricscited by 17
  11. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Hallucinating Pristine Featurescited by 16
  12. 2024UHD-IQA Benchmark Database: Pushing the Boundaries of Blind Photo Quality Assessmentcited by 16
38 more
  1. 2023Quality-aware Pre-trained Models for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 15
  2. 2022Content-Variant Reference Image Quality Assessment via Knowledge Distillationcited by 14
  3. 2023Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attackscited by 14
  4. 2024SEAGULL: No-reference Image Quality Assessment for Regions of Interest via Vision-Language Instruction Tuningcited by 13
  5. 2024Bringing Textual Prompt to AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 12
  6. 2025KVQ: Boosting Video Quality Assessment via Saliency-guided Local Perceptioncited by 11
  7. 2022TractoSCR: A Novel Supervised Contrastive Regression Framework for Prediction of Neurocognitive Measures Using Multi-Site Harmonized Diffusion MRI Tractographycited by 9
  8. 2022KonX: Cross-Resolution Image Quality Assessmentcited by 9
  9. 2023Gap-closing Matters: Perceptual Quality Evaluation and Optimization of Low-Light Image Enhancementcited by 7
  10. 2023Fast Adversarial CNN-based Perturbation Attack on No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metricscited by 7
  11. 2024Defense Against Adversarial Attacks on No-Reference Image Quality Models with Gradient Norm Regularizationcited by 7
  12. 2024AIM 2024 Challenge on Compressed Video Quality Assessment: Methods and Resultscited by 7
  13. 2021Degraded Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  14. 2022Image Quality Assessment: Integrating Model-Centric and Data-Centric Approachescited by 5
  15. 2024GMC-IQA: Exploiting Global-correlation and Mean-opinion Consistency for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  16. 2024High Resolution Image Quality Databasecited by 5
  17. 2024Adversarial purification for no-reference image-quality metrics: applicability study and new methodscited by 5
  18. 2024Guardians of Image Quality: Benchmarking Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Quality Metricscited by 5
  19. 2025Omnidirectional Image Quality Captioning: A Large-scale Database and A New Modelcited by 5
  20. 2022Fine-grained Correlation Loss for Regressioncited by 4
  21. 2023Blind Multimodal Quality Assessment of Low-light Imagescited by 4
  22. 2026Decoupling Semantics from Distortions: Multi-Scale Two-Stream Vision-Language Alignment for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 4
  23. 2024Beyond Score Changes: Adversarial Attack on No-Reference Image Quality Assessment from Two Perspectivescited by 3
  24. 2022Image Quality Assessment with Gradient Siamese Networkcited by 2
  25. 2022Learning from Mixed Datasets: A Monotonic Image Quality Assessment Modelcited by 2
  26. 2022Content-Diverse Comparisons improve IQAcited by 2
  27. 2025Multi-Dimensional Quality Assessment for Text-to-3D Assets: Dataset and Modelcited by 2
  28. 2025Max360IQ: Blind Omnidirectional Image Quality Assessment with Multi-axis Attentioncited by 2
  29. 2025Viewport-Unaware Blind Omnidirectional Image Quality Assessment: A Flexible and Effective Paradigmcited by 2
  30. 2025MDIQA: Unified Image Quality Assessment for Multi-dimensional Evaluation and Restorationcited by 2
  31. 2023SAM-IQA: Can Segment Anything Boost Image Quality Assessment?cited by 1
  32. 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Brief Surveycited by 1
  33. 2024AID-AppEAL: Automatic Image Dataset and Algorithm for Content Appeal Enhancement and Assessment Labelingcited by 1
  34. 2025Computational Analysis of Degradation Modeling in Blind Panoramic Image Quality Assessmentcited by 1
  35. 2025LEHA-CVQAD: Dataset To Enable Generalized Video Quality Assessment of Compression Artifactscited by 1
  36. 2025SEGA: A Transferable Signed Ensemble Gaussian Black-Box Attack against No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Modelscited by 1
  37. 2024PKU-AIGIQA-4K: A Perceptual Quality Assessment Database for Both Text-to-Image and Image-to-Image AI-Generated Imagescited by 0
  38. 2024LIME-Eval: Rethinking Low-light Image Enhancement Evaluation via Object Detectioncited by 0

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)