mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Defense Against Adversarial Attacks on No-Reference Image Quality Models with Gradient Norm Regularization

arXiv 2403.11397 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2024cs.CV eess.IVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The task of No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) is to estimate the quality score of an input image without additional information. NR-IQA models play a crucial role in the media industry, aiding in performance evaluation and optimization guidance. However, these models are found to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which introduce imperceptible perturbations to input images, resulting in significant changes in predicted scores. In this paper, we propose a defense method to improve the stability in predicted scores when attacked by small perturbations, thus enhancing the adversarial robustness of NR-IQA models. To be specific, we present theoretical evidence showing that the magnitude of score changes is related to the ℓ1 norm of the model's gradient with respect to the input image. Building upon this theoretical foundation, we propose a norm regularization training strategy aimed at reducing the ℓ1 norm of the gradient, thereby boosting the robustness of NR-IQA models. Experiments conducted on four NR-IQA baseline models demonstrate the effectiveness of our strategy in reducing score changes in the presence of adversarial attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this work marks the first attempt to defend against adversarial attacks on NR-IQA models. Our study offers valuable insights into the adversarial robustness of NR-IQA models and provides a foundation for future research in this area.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2024.

Builds on

32 of 53 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  8. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  9. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
  10. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  11. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
  12. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
20 more
  1. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
  2. 2022MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 514
  3. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  4. 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 261
  5. 2018Generating Adversarial Examples with Adversarial Networkscited by 256
  6. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 221
  7. 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 208
  8. 2017Generating Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 182
  9. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
  10. 2018Prior Convictions: Black-Box Adversarial Attacks with Bandits and Priorscited by 145
  11. 2019RankSRGAN: Generative Adversarial Networks with Ranker for Image Super-Resolutioncited by 145
  12. 2018Learned Video Compressioncited by 89
  13. 2020Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 54
  14. 2019Scaleable input gradient regularization for adversarial robustnesscited by 45
  15. 2022Perceptual Attacks of No-Reference Image Quality Models with Human-in-the-Loopcited by 30
  16. 2019Impact of Adversarial Examples on Deep Learning Models for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 26
  17. 2020Uncovering the Connections Between Adversarial Transferability and Knowledge Transferabilitycited by 20
  18. 2022Universal Perturbation Attack on Differentiable No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metricscited by 17
  19. 2023Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attackscited by 14
  20. 2023Fast Adversarial CNN-based Perturbation Attack on No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metricscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

7 papers.