mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Feature-Space Smoothing: Certified Robustness of Deep Representations

arXiv 2601.16200 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern deep learning models exhibit strong capabilities across diverse applications, yet remain vulnerable to malicious inputs that induce erroneous predictions via feature-space distortion. To address this vulnerability, we propose Feature-space Smoothing (FS), a general defense framework that provides certified robustness at the feature representation level. We show that FS converts a given feature encoder into a smoothed variant that is guaranteed to maintain a certified lower bound on the cosine similarity between clean and adversarial features under l_2-bounded perturbations. We then establish that this Feature Cosine Similarity Bound (FCSB) can be extended to the prediction-wise certification under the cosine similarity measure, and the value of FCSB is determined by the encoder intrinsic Gaussian robustness score. Building on those insights, we introduce the Gaussian Smoothness Booster (GSB), a plug-and-play module to improve the encoder Gaussian robustness score. Specifically, the GSB module is plugged to enhance the feature-space consistency and maintain the feature utility for downstream tasks under Gaussian perturbations. This design enables seamless integration of FS on the protected model, e.g., Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), without additional model retraining or alignment, improving its robustness while preserving the performance for downstream task-oriented decoding. Extensive experiments demonstrate that integrating FS consistently provides non-trivial certified robustness and significantly improves task-oriented performance under strong white-box adversarial attacks across diverse models and applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2026.

Builds on

72 of 84 references.

References · 72

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  7. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  8. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  9. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  10. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  11. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
  12. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 798
38 more
  1. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  2. 2023OpenFlamingo: An Open-Source Framework for Training Large Autoregressive Vision-Language Modelscited by 565
  3. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
  4. 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 476
  5. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
  6. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 330
  7. 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 328
  8. 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 306
  9. 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 284
  10. 2023Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language Modelscited by 273
  11. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 194
  12. 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 185
  13. 2024Agent Smith: A Single Image Can Jailbreak One Million Multimodal LLM Agents Exponentially Fastcited by 153
  14. 2019Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability with an Intermediate Level Attackcited by 140
  15. 2024Images are Achilles' Heel of Alignment: Exploiting Visual Vulnerabilities for Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 136
  16. 2021Adversarial purification with Score-based generative modelscited by 134
  17. 2024AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Promptingcited by 125
  18. 2024Robust CLIP: Unsupervised Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Vision Embeddings for Robust Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 120
  19. 2024Efficient Adversarial Training in LLMs with Continuous Attackscited by 113
  20. 2023On the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Image Adversarial Attackscited by 92
  21. 2024Defending Against Unforeseen Failure Modes with Latent Adversarial Trainingcited by 88
  22. 2022Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Surveycited by 67
  23. 2023Robust Evaluation of Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purificationcited by 65
  24. 2024Steering Away from Harm: An Adaptive Approach to Defending Vision Language Model Against Jailbreakscited by 48
  25. 2020Detection as Regression: Certified Object Detection by Median Smoothingcited by 47
  26. 2024AnyAttack: Towards Large-scale Self-supervised Adversarial Attacks on Vision-language Modelscited by 46
  27. 2023Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 44
  28. 2024Immune: Improving Safety Against Jailbreaks in Multi-modal LLMs via Inference-Time Alignmentcited by 44
  29. 2025Adversarial Attacks against Closed-Source MLLMs via Feature Optimal Alignmentcited by 43
  30. 2023An Adaptive Model Ensemble Adversarial Attack for Boosting Adversarial Transferabilitycited by 42
  31. 2024Chain of Attack: On the Robustness of Vision-Language Models Against Transfer-Based Adversarial Attackscited by 39
  32. 2025A Frustratingly Simple Yet Highly Effective Attack Baseline: Over 90% Success Rate Against the Strong Black-box Models of GPT-4.5/4o/o1cited by 37
  33. 2020Yet Another Intermediate-Level Attackcited by 35
  34. 2024Revisiting Adversarial Training at Scalecited by 33
  35. 2023Improving Adversarial Transferability via Intermediate-level Perturbation Decaycited by 29
  36. 2025SafeMLRM: Demystifying Safety in Multi-modal Large Reasoning Modelscited by 29
  37. 2024Break the Visual Perception: Adversarial Attacks Targeting Encoded Visual Tokens of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 27
  38. 2020Stronger and Faster Wasserstein Adversarial Attackscited by 25

50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Robustness of Unsupervised Representation Learning without Labels
  2. 2026Learning Better Certified Models from Empirically-Robust Teachers
  3. 2026The Geometry of Robustness: Optimizing Loss Landscape Curvature and Feature Manifold Alignment for Robust Finetuning of Vision-Language Models
  4. 2024Exploring Adversarial Robustness of Deep State Space Models
  5. 2021Improved, Deterministic Smoothing for L_1 Certified Robustness
  6. 2024Adversarial Feature Alignment: Balancing Robustness and Accuracy in Deep Learning via Adversarial Training
  7. 2025Randomized Smoothing Meets Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Robust Representation Consistency Model via Contrastive Denoising