mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Attack and Defense in Deep Ranking

arXiv 2106.03614 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Neural Network classifiers are vulnerable to adversarial attack, where an imperceptible perturbation could result in misclassification. However, the vulnerability of DNN-based image ranking systems remains under-explored. In this paper, we propose two attacks against deep ranking systems, i.e., Candidate Attack and Query Attack, that can raise or lower the rank of chosen candidates by adversarial perturbations. Specifically, the expected ranking order is first represented as a set of inequalities, and then a triplet-like objective function is designed to obtain the optimal perturbation. Conversely, an anti-collapse triplet defense is proposed to improve the ranking model robustness against all proposed attacks, where the model learns to prevent the positive and negative samples being pulled close to each other by adversarial attack. To comprehensively measure the empirical adversarial robustness of a ranking model with our defense, we propose an empirical robustness score, which involves a set of representative attacks against ranking models. Our adversarial ranking attacks and defenses are evaluated on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CUB200-2011, CARS196 and Stanford Online Products datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that a typical deep ranking system can be effectively compromised by our attacks. Nevertheless, our defense can significantly improve the ranking system robustness, and simultaneously mitigate a wide range of attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.

Builds on

59 of 90 references.

References · 59

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  9. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  10. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  11. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  12. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
38 more
  1. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  2. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  3. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
  4. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  5. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  6. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  7. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
  8. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  9. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
  10. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
  11. 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
  12. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  13. 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 440
  14. 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 317
  15. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
  16. 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 288
  17. 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
  18. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
  19. 2014Learning Fine-grained Image Similarity with Deep Rankingcited by 189
  20. 2019Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognitioncited by 173
  21. 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 158
  22. 2017EAD: Elastic-Net Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Adversarial Examplescited by 154
  23. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  24. 2019Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability with an Intermediate Level Attackcited by 139
  25. 2020Revisiting Training Strategies and Generalization Performance in Deep Metric Learningcited by 99
  26. 2019Sparse and Imperceivable Adversarial Attackscited by 95
  27. 2018Deflecting Adversarial Attacks with Pixel Deflectioncited by 71
  28. 2017Robust Physical-World Attacks on Deep Learning Modelscited by 70
  29. 2018Adv-BNN: Improved Adversarial Defense through Robust Bayesian Neural Networkcited by 68
  30. 2018Generalizable Adversarial Training via Spectral Normalizationcited by 68
  31. 2015Adversarial Manipulation of Deep Representationscited by 56
  32. 2018Adversarial Personalized Ranking for Recommendationcited by 48
  33. 2018Bilateral Adversarial Training: Towards Fast Training of More Robust Models Against Adversarial Attackscited by 48
  34. 2020Transferable, Controllable, and Inconspicuous Adversarial Attacks on Person Re-identification With Deep Mis-Rankingcited by 42
  35. 2019Curls & Whey: Boosting Black-Box Adversarial Attackscited by 37
  36. 2019advPattern: Physical-World Attacks on Deep Person Re-Identification via Adversarially Transformable Patternscited by 35
  37. 2018Universal Perturbation Attack Against Image Retrievalcited by 31
  38. 2019Targeted Mismatch Adversarial Attack: Query with a Flower to Retrieve the Towercited by 26

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4.

8 papers.