mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

One-Token Verification for Reasoning Correctness Estimation

arXiv 2603.01025 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) have led to notable successes in complex reasoning tasks, such as mathematical problem solving. A common strategy for improving performance is parallel thinking, in which multiple reasoning traces are generated and the final prediction is made using aggregation schemes like majority voting or best-of-N decoding. However, two key challenges persist. First, multi-sample decoding incurs substantial inference latency, especially for long-form outputs. Second, effective mechanisms for reliably assessing the correctness of individual reasoning traces are still limited. To address these challenges, we introduce One-Token Verification (OTV), a computational method that estimates reasoning correctness in a single forward pass during generation. OTV is activated by a learnable token and integrated into the LLM via low-rank adaptation to probe internal reasoning signals through the key-value cache, supporting token-level correctness estimation at any stage of generation without disrupting primary reasoning. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that OTV consistently surpasses existing verifiers. Additionally, OTV reduces token usage by up to 90% through correctness-guided early termination, prioritizing shorter, more reliable solutions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 54 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2026.

Builds on

54 of 75 references.

Closest ancestors · 15

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Parallel-R1: Towards Parallel Thinking via Reinforcement Learning9 Sep
  2. 2025ParaThinker: Native Parallel Thinking as a New Paradigm to Scale LLM Test-time Compute30 Aug
  3. 2025Deep Think with Confidence21 Aug
  4. 2025Trust but Verify! A Survey on Verification Design for Test-time Scaling20 Aug
  5. 2025Does Thinking More always Help? Mirage of Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning Models4 Jun
  6. 2025Solve-Detect-Verify: Inference-Time Scaling with Flexible Generative Verifier17 May
  7. 2025Group Think: Multiple Concurrent Reasoning Agents Collaborating at Token Level Granularity16 May
  8. 2025Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification7 Apr
  9. 2025Sampling-Efficient Test-Time Scaling: Self-Estimating the Best-of-N Sampling in Early Decoding3 Mar
  10. 2025Multi-Agent Verification: Scaling Test-Time Compute with Multiple Verifiers27 Feb
  11. 2025Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Self-Calibration25 Feb
  12. 2025Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-Certainty25 Feb
3 more
  1. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  2. 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec
  3. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet3 Oct

Other references · 39

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  5. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  6. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  7. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  8. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  9. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  10. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,193
  11. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
  12. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
27 more
  1. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
  2. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
  3. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  4. 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
  5. 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
  6. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 465
  7. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 426
  8. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
  9. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
  10. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 308
  11. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 267
  12. 2022ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoningcited by 175
  13. 2024Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 159
  14. 2024Accessing GPT-4 level Mathematical Olympiad Solutions via Monte Carlo Tree Self-refine with LLaMa-3 8Bcited by 156
  15. 2024Critique-out-Loud Reward Modelscited by 105
  16. 2023OVM, Outcome-supervised Value Models for Planning in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 84
  17. 2024AceMath: Advancing Frontier Math Reasoning with Post-Training and Reward Modelingcited by 76
  18. 2025Diffusion Language Models Know the Answer Before Decodingcited by 68
  19. 2025Evaluating Step-by-step Reasoning Traces: A Surveycited by 62
  20. 2024When is Tree Search Useful for LLM Planning? It Depends on the Discriminatorcited by 46
  21. 2025Your LLM Knows the Future: Uncovering Its Multi-Token Prediction Potentialcited by 46
  22. 2025The Majority is not always right: RL training for solution aggregationcited by 46
  23. 2025VersaPRM: Multi-Domain Process Reward Model via Synthetic Reasoning Datacited by 39
  24. 2025Multiverse: Your Language Models Secretly Decide How to Parallelize and Merge Generationcited by 30
  25. 2024Step-by-Step Reasoning for Math Problems via Twisted Sequential Monte Carlocited by 21
  26. 2025Uncertainty-Aware Step-wise Verification with Generative Reward Modelscited by 21
  27. 2025RvLLM: LLM Runtime Verification with Domain Knowledgecited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Sample Smart, Not Hard: Correctness-First Decoding for Better Reasoning in LLMs
  2. 2024Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability
  3. 2026Probability is Not Enough: Exploring and Counting Divergent Tokens for Reasoning Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs
  4. 2025Token Assorted: Mixing Latent and Text Tokens for Improved Language Model Reasoning
  5. 2026Thinking by Subtraction: Confidence-Driven Contrastive Decoding for LLM Reasoning
  6. 2025OckBench: Measuring the Efficiency of LLM Reasoning
  7. 2024Learning From Correctness Without Prompting Makes LLM Efficient Reasoner
  8. 2024Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification