VerifierQ: Enhancing LLM Test Time Compute with Q-Learning-based Verifiers
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in test time compute, particularly through the use of verifier models, have significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). This generator-verifier approach closely resembles the actor-critic framework in reinforcement learning (RL). However, current verifier models in LLMs often rely on supervised fine-tuning without temporal difference learning such as Q-learning. This paper introduces VerifierQ, a novel approach that integrates Offline Q-learning into LLM verifier models. We address three key challenges in applying Q-learning to LLMs: (1) handling utterance-level Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), (2) managing large action spaces, and (3) mitigating overestimation bias. VerifierQ introduces a modified Bellman update for bounded Q-values, incorporates Implicit Q-learning (IQL) for efficient action space management, and integrates a novel Conservative Q-learning (CQL) formulation for balanced Q-value estimation. Our method enables parallel Q-value computation and improving training efficiency. While recent work has explored RL techniques like MCTS for generators, VerifierQ is among the first to investigate the verifier (critic) aspect in LLMs through Q-learning. This integration of RL principles into verifier models complements existing advancements in generator techniques, potentially enabling more robust and adaptive reasoning in LLMs. Experimental results on mathematical reasoning tasks demonstrate VerifierQ's superior performance compared to traditional supervised fine-tuning approaches, with improvements in efficiency, accuracy and robustness. By enhancing the synergy between generation and evaluation capabilities, VerifierQ contributes to the ongoing evolution of AI systems in addressing complex cognitive tasks across various domains.
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2024.
Builds on
9 of 21 references.
References · 9
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
- 2024TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Modelcited by 604
- 2024Accessing GPT-4 level Mathematical Olympiad Solutions via Monte Carlo Tree Self-refine with LLaMa-3 8Bcited by 156
- 2024Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planningcited by 95
- 2022When Should We Prefer Offline Reinforcement Learning Over Behavioral Cloning?cited by 86
- 2022CHAI: A CHatbot AI for Task-Oriented Dialogue with Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 12; 2026: 2.
14 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
- 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 129
- 2025A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoningcited by 40
- 2025LLaVA-Critic-R1: Your Critic Model is Secretly a Strong Policy Modelcited by 34
- 2025From Passive to Active Reasoning: Can Large Language Models Ask the Right Questions under Incomplete Information?cited by 21
- 2025A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2025A Survey on Feedback-based Multi-step Reasoning for Large Language Models on Mathematicscited by 11
- 2025Trust but Verify! A Survey on Verification Design for Test-time Scalingcited by 8
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Surveycited by 7
- 2025Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modelingcited by 4
- 2025The 4/δ Bound: Designing Predictable LLM-Verifier Systems for Formal Method Guaranteecited by 1
- 2026Online Finetuning Decision Transformers with Pure RL Gradientscited by 1
- 2026TensorCommitments: A Lightweight Verifiable Inference for Language Models13 Feb 2026
- 2026Online Finetuning Decision Transformers with Pure RL Gradients1 Jan 2026
- 2025The 4/δ Bound: Designing Predictable LLM-Verifier Systems for Formal Method Guarantee30 Nov 2025
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Survey2 Oct 2025
- 2025LLaVA-Critic-R1: Your Critic Model is Secretly a Strong Policy Model31 Aug 2025
- 2025Trust but Verify! A Survey on Verification Design for Test-time Scaling20 Aug 2025
- 2025MAVIS: Multi-Objective Alignment via Inference-Time Value-Guided Selection19 Aug 2025
- 2025Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modeling4 Aug 2025
- 2025A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models5 Jul 2025
- 2025From Passive to Active Reasoning: Can Large Language Models Ask the Right Questions under Incomplete Information?9 Jun 2025
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar 2025
- 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Models28 Feb 2025
- 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 129
- 2025A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoningcited by 40
- 2025From Passive to Active Reasoning: Can Large Language Models Ask the Right Questions under Incomplete Information?cited by 21
- 2025A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2025A Survey on Feedback-based Multi-step Reasoning for Large Language Models on Mathematicscited by 11
- 2025Trust but Verify! A Survey on Verification Design for Test-time Scalingcited by 8
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Surveycited by 7
- 2025Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modelingcited by 4
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Survey2 Oct 2025
- 2025Trust but Verify! A Survey on Verification Design for Test-time Scaling20 Aug 2025
- 2025Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modeling4 Aug 2025
- 2025A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models5 Jul 2025
- 2025From Passive to Active Reasoning: Can Large Language Models Ask the Right Questions under Incomplete Information?9 Jun 2025
- 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Models28 Feb 2025
- 2025A Survey on Feedback-based Multi-step Reasoning for Large Language Models on Mathematics20 Feb 2025
- 2025A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoning5 Jan 2025
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025VerifyBench: A Systematic Benchmark for Evaluating Reasoning Verifiers Across Domains
- 2025Continuous Self-Improvement of Large Language Models by Test-time Training with Verifier-Driven Sample Selection
- 2024Enhancing Decision-Making for LLM Agents via Step-Level Q-Value Models
- 2026AutoPyVerifier: Learning Compact Executable Verifiers for Large Language Model Outputs
- 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
- 2025QeRL: Beyond Efficiency -- Quantization-enhanced Reinforcement Learning for LLMs
- 2026Generate, Filter, Control, Replay: A Comprehensive Survey of Rollout Strategies for LLM Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifiers