mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stackelberg Coupling of Online Representation Learning and Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2508.07452 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Q-learning jointly learns representations and values within monolithic networks, promising beneficial co-adaptation between features and value estimates. Although this architecture has attained substantial success, the coupling between representation and value learning creates instability as representations must constantly adapt to non-stationary value targets, while value estimates depend on these shifting representations. This is compounded by high variance in bootstrapped targets, which causes bias in value estimation in off-policy methods. We introduce Stackelberg Coupled Representation and Reinforcement Learning (SCORER), a framework for value-based RL that views representation and Q-learning as two strategic agents in a hierarchical game. SCORER models the Q-function as the leader, which commits to its strategy by updating less frequently, while the perception network (encoder) acts as the follower, adapting more frequently to learn representations that minimize Bellman error variance given the leader's committed strategy. Through this division of labor, the Q-function minimizes MSBE while perception minimizes its variance, thereby reducing bias accordingly, with asymmetric updates allowing stable co-adaptation, unlike simultaneous parameter updates in monolithic solutions. Our proposed SCORER framework leads to a bi-level optimization problem whose solution is approximated by a two-timescale algorithm that creates an asymmetric learning dynamic between the two players. Extensive experiments on DQN and its variants demonstrate that gains stem from algorithmic insight rather than model complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 64 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2025.

Builds on

64 of 90 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Simplifying Deep Temporal Difference Learning5 Jul
  2. 2024Iterated Q-Network: Beyond One-Step Bellman Updates in Deep Reinforcement Learning4 Mar

Other references · 62

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  4. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  5. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  6. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
  7. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
  8. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
  9. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 786
  10. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 785
  11. 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 760
  12. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 721
38 more
  1. 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 539
  2. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
  3. 2020Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstructioncited by 436
  4. 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 404
  5. 2021Mastering Visual Continuous Control: Improved Data-Augmented Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  6. 2023Minigrid & Miniworld: Modular & Customizable Reinforcement Learning Environments for Goal-Oriented Taskscited by 327
  7. 2020Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive Representationscited by 318
  8. 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generationcited by 288
  9. 2016Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 286
  10. 2017Revisiting the Arcade Learning Environment: Evaluation Protocols and Open Problems for General Agentscited by 269
  11. 2020Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement Learningcited by 269
  12. 2018Provably Efficient Maximum Entropy Explorationcited by 242
  13. 2018Approximation Methods for Bilevel Programmingcited by 236
  14. 2016Learning to Navigate in Complex Environmentscited by 198
  15. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 174
  16. 2020Deep Network Approximation for Smooth Functionscited by 164
  17. 2019Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Ataricited by 144
  18. 2020A Two-Timescale Framework for Bilevel Optimization: Complexity Analysis and Application to Actor-Criticcited by 144
  19. 2017Visualizing and Understanding Atari Agentscited by 141
  20. 2020Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 134
  21. 2019Behaviour Suite for Reinforcement Learningcited by 132
  22. 2018State Representation Learning for Control: An Overviewcited by 127
  23. 2022Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement Learningcited by 125
  24. 2021Contrastive Behavioral Similarity Embeddings for Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 123
  25. 2022BOME! Bilevel Optimization Made Easy: A Simple First-Order Approachcited by 105
  26. 2022Discovered Policy Optimisationcited by 104
  27. 2023A Fully First-Order Method for Stochastic Bilevel Optimizationcited by 100
  28. 2023For SALE: State-Action Representation Learning for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
  29. 2020Approximate information state for approximate planning and reinforcement learning in partially observed systemscited by 70
  30. 2020The Value-Improvement Path: Towards Better Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
  31. 2020Predictive Information Accelerates Learning in RLcited by 56
  32. 2019A Geometric Perspective on Optimal Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
  33. 2022Atari-5: Distilling the Arcade Learning Environment down to Five Gamescited by 44
  34. 2023An Introduction to Bi-level Optimization: Foundations and Applications in Signal Processing and Machine Learningcited by 41
  35. 2021Return-Based Contrastive Representation Learning for Reinforcement Learningcited by 36
  36. 2022Simultaneous approximation of a smooth function and its derivatives by deep neural networks with piecewise-polynomial activationscited by 29
  37. 2021Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Broad-XAI: A Conceptual Framework and Surveycited by 24
  38. 2022Investigating the Properties of Neural Network Representations in Reinforcement Learningcited by 24

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Mixed Q-Functionals: Advancing Value-Based Methods in Cooperative MARL with Continuous Action Domains
  2. 2026Long-Horizon Q-Learning: Accurate Value Learning via n-Step Inequalities
  3. 2023Stackelberg Batch Policy Learning
  4. 2023Understanding, Predicting and Better Resolving Q-Value Divergence in Offline-RL
  5. 2021Reinforcement Learning In Two Player Zero Sum Simultaneous Action Games
  6. 2024Exploiting Estimation Bias in Clipped Double Q-Learning for Continous Control Reinforcement Learning Tasks
  7. 2024Towards Adapting Reinforcement Learning Agents to New Tasks: Insights from Q-Values
  8. 2026Latent Representation Alignment for Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning