Learning from fracture: Teaching language models to design through physical experience
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How can language models learn to optimize physical designs through experience? We introduce FracLearn, an experience-abstraction-generalization framework evaluated through a deliberately unfamiliar, Tetris-inspired fracture game. The model first proposes architectures and examines simulated fracture responses to accumulate experience. Abstraction organizes these observations into conditional principles linking reinforcement placement, crack evolution and load transfer, with supporting evidence and failure conditions. Generalization challenges the model to combine these principles in new architectures and surpass the earlier design record. Campaigns demonstrate progressive refinement and recovery through hypothesis revision, yielding a best composite score 11.0% above the experience-stage record. Fracture analyses connect improved performance to crack deflection and temporary trapping as toughening mechanisms, alongside greater residual load capacity. Learning occurs through external knowledge and decisions, without model-weight updates. This approach offers a route to scientific agents that turn computational experiments into reusable physical knowledge for materials discovery and engineering design.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.
Builds on
18 of 60 references.
References · 18
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
- 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 876
- 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 631
- 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 415
6 more
- 2020Experience Grounds Languagecited by 242
- 2023MechAgents: Large language model multi-agent collaborations can solve mechanics problems, generate new data, and integrate knowledgecited by 63
- 2023BioinspiredLLM: Conversational Large Language Model for the Mechanics of Biological and Bio-inspired Materialscited by 30
- 2025DeepPHY: Benchmarking Agentic VLMs on Physical Reasoningcited by 14
- 2025LLMs for Bayesian Optimization in Scientific Domains: Are We There Yet?cited by 14
- 2023Computational Discovery of Microstructured Composites with Optimal Stiffness-Toughness Trade-Offscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.