Context-aware Risk Assessment and Its Application in Autonomous Driving
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring safety in autonomous driving requires precise, real-time risk assessment and adaptive behavior. Prior work on risk estimation either outputs coarse, global scene-level metrics lacking interpretability, proposes indicators without concrete integration into autonomous systems, or focuses narrowly on specific driving scenarios. We introduce the Context-aware Risk Index (CRI), a light-weight modular framework that quantifies directional risks based on object kinematics and spatial relationships, dynamically adjusting control commands in real time. CRI employs direction-aware spatial partitioning within a dynamic safety envelope using Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) principles, a hybrid probabilistic-max fusion strategy for risk aggregation, and an adaptive control policy for real-time behavior modulation. We evaluate CRI on the Bench2Drive benchmark comprising 220 safety-critical scenarios using a state-of-the-art end-to-end model Transfuser++ on challenging routes. Our collision-rate metrics show a 19% reduction (p = 0.003) in vehicle collisions per failed route, a 20% reduction (p = 0.004) in collisions per kilometer, a 17% increase (p = 0.016) in composed driving score, and a statistically significant reduction in penalty scores (p = 0.013) with very low overhead (3.6 ms per decision cycle). These results demonstrate that CRI substantially improves safety and robustness in complex, risk-intensive environments while maintaining modularity and low runtime overhead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
References · 6
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
- 2024Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 252
- 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 131
- 2023Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Modelscited by 96
- 2023FollowNet: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Car-Following Behavior Modelingcited by 21
- 2021Risk-Based Safety Envelopes for Autonomous Vehicles Under Perception Uncertaintycited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Towards Benchmarking and Assessing the Safety and Robustness of Autonomous Driving on Safety-critical Scenarios
- 2025REACT: Runtime-Enabled Active Collision-avoidance Technique for Autonomous Driving
- 2024SafeDrive: Knowledge- and Data-Driven Risk-Sensitive Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles with Large Language Models
- 2026READ: Learning Risk-Informed Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
- 2025Collision Risk Estimation via Loss Prediction in End-to-End Autonomous Driving
- 2026Localized Conformal Safety Monitoring with Vision-Language Models for Autonomous Driving
- 2025Drive in Corridors: Enhancing the Safety of End-to-end Autonomous Driving via Corridor Learning and Planning
- 2024Enhanced Safety in Autonomous Driving: Integrating Latent State Diffusion Model for End-to-End Navigation