REACT: Runtime-Enabled Active Collision-avoidance Technique for Autonomous Driving
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing
Abstract (arXiv)
Achieving rapid and effective active collision avoidance in dynamic interactive traffic remains a core challenge for autonomous driving. This paper proposes REACT (Runtime-Enabled Active Collision-avoidance Technique), a closed-loop framework that integrates risk assessment with active avoidance control. By leveraging energy transfer principles and human-vehicle-road interaction modeling, REACT dynamically quantifies runtime risk and constructs a continuous spatial risk field. The system incorporates physically grounded safety constraints such as directional risk and traffic rules to identify high-risk zones and generate feasible, interpretable avoidance behaviors. A hierarchical warning trigger strategy and lightweight system design enhance runtime efficiency while ensuring real-time responsiveness. Evaluations across four representative high-risk scenarios including car-following braking, cut-in, rear-approaching, and intersection conflict demonstrate REACT's capability to accurately identify critical risks and execute proactive avoidance. Its risk estimation aligns closely with human driver cognition (i.e., warning lead time < 0.4 s), achieving 100% safe avoidance with zero false alarms or missed detections. Furthermore, it exhibits superior real-time performance (< 50 ms latency), strong foresight, and generalization. The lightweight architecture achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, highlighting its potential for real-time deployment in safety-critical autonomous systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 4 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.
Builds on
4 of 28 references.
References · 4
- 2024Predicting Safety Misbehaviours in Autonomous Driving Systems using Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 11
- 2016Evaluating Trajectory Collision Probability through Adaptive Importance Sampling for Safe Motion Planningcited by 10
- 2023Reachability-Based Confidence-Aware Probabilistic Collision Detection in Highway Drivingcited by 5
- 2025SafeCast: Risk-Responsive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Context-aware Risk Assessment and Its Application in Autonomous Driving
- 2025Advanced Longitudinal Control and Collision Avoidance for High-Risk Edge Cases in Autonomous Driving
- 2025Argus: Resilience-Oriented Safety Assurance Framework for End-to-End ADSs
- 2026HiDrive: A Closed-Loop Benchmark for High-Level Autonomous Driving
- 2025Safety2Drive: Safety-Critical Scenario Benchmark for the Evaluation of Autonomous Driving
- 2025Collision Risk Estimation via Loss Prediction in End-to-End Autonomous Driving
- 2024Prediction Horizon Requirements for Automated Driving: Optimizing Safety, Comfort, and Efficiency
- 2025Risk-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: Improving Safety When Driving through Intersection