mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ExCyTIn-Bench: Evaluating LLM agents on Cyber Threat Investigation

arXiv 2507.14201 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 15

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

We present ExCyTIn-Bench, the first benchmark to Evaluate an LLM agent X on the task of Cyber Threat Investigation through security questions derived from investigation graphs. Real-world security analysts must sift through a large number of heterogeneous security logs, follow multi-hop chains of evidence to investigate threats. With the developments of LLMs, building LLM-based agents for automatic threat investigation is a promising direction. We construct a benchmark from a controlled Azure tenant including a SQL environment covering 57 log tables from Microsoft Sentinel and related services, and 7542 generated questions. We leverage security logs extracted with expert-crafted detection logic to build threat investigation graphs, and then generate questions with LLMs using paired nodes on the graph, taking the start node as background context and the end node as answer. Anchoring each question to these explicit nodes and edges not only provides automatic, explainable ground truth answers but also makes the pipeline reusable and readily extensible to new logs. Our comprehensive experiments on the test set with different models confirm the difficulty of the task: the best model so far can achieve a reward of 0.606, leaving much headroom for future research. The code is available at https://github.com/microsoft/SecRL

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 46 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2025.

Builds on

46 of 72 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024AutoDefense: Multi-Agent LLM Defense against Jailbreak Attacks2 Mar

Other references · 45

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  3. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  4. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  5. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  6. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  7. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  8. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  9. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  10. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
  11. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
  12. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
33 more
  1. 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
  2. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 465
  3. 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 378
  4. 2023StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Datacited by 339
  5. 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 339
  6. 2025Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Datacited by 323
  7. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 229
  8. 2024CHESS: Contextual Harnessing for Efficient SQL Synthesiscited by 164
  9. 2023C3: Zero-shot Text-to-SQL with ChatGPTcited by 159
  10. 2023MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQLcited by 158
  11. 2024InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Taskscited by 134
  12. 2023Avalon's Game of Thoughts: Battle Against Deception through Recursive Contemplationcited by 102
  13. 2018NL2Bash: A Corpus and Semantic Parser for Natural Language Interface to the Linux Operating Systemcited by 97
  14. 2023ReAcTable: Enhancing ReAct for Table Question Answeringcited by 76
  15. 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 70
  16. 2023MathChat: Converse to Tackle Challenging Math Problems with LLM Agentscited by 67
  17. 2024StateFlow: Enhancing LLM Task-Solving through State-Driven Workflowscited by 65
  18. 2024CTIBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 61
  19. 2023ScienceBenchmark: A Complex Real-World Benchmark for Evaluating Natural Language to SQL Systemscited by 42
  20. 2024CRAB: Cross-environment Agent Benchmark for Multimodal Language Model Agentscited by 38
  21. 2023SecQA: A Concise Question-Answering Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Computer Securitycited by 37
  22. 2024MAGIC: Generating Self-Correction Guideline for In-Context Text-to-SQLcited by 34
  23. 2024A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Cyber Defences: Opportunities and Directionscited by 33
  24. 2018SLEUTH: Real-time Attack Scenario Reconstruction from COTS Audit Datacited by 28
  25. 2024SecBench: A Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional Benchmarking Dataset for LLMs in Cybersecuritycited by 21
  26. 2023Out of the Cage: How Stochastic Parrots Win in Cyber Security Environmentscited by 17
  27. 2023Time for aCTIon: Automated Analysis of Cyber Threat Intelligence in the Wildcited by 15
  28. 2023AGIR: Automating Cyber Threat Intelligence Reporting with Natural Language Generationcited by 15
  29. 2020Enabling Efficient Cyber Threat Hunting With Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 12
  30. 2024CyberPal.AI: Empowering LLMs with Expert-Driven Cybersecurity Instructionscited by 12
  31. 2023On Evaluating the Integration of Reasoning and Action in LLM Agents with Database Question Answeringcited by 10
  32. 2024Crimson: Empowering Strategic Reasoning in Cybersecurity through Large Language Modelscited by 8
  33. 2024Towards an AI-Enhanced Cyber Threat Intelligence Processing Pipelinecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 12.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AttackSeqBench: Benchmarking the Capabilities of LLMs for Attack Sequences Understanding
  2. 2026Towards Agentic Investigation of Security Alerts
  3. 2025CTIConnect: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs over Heterogeneous Cyber Threat Intelligence
  4. 2025AthenaBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligence
  5. 2026Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Security Incident Analysis
  6. 2026Beyond RAG for Cyber Threat Intelligence: A Systematic Evaluation of Graph-Based and Agentic Retrieval
  7. 2025SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks
  8. 2025DefenderBench: A Toolkit for Evaluating Language Agents in Cybersecurity Environments