Continual Learning, Not Training: Online Adaptation For Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems
Abstract (arXiv)
Continual Learning (CL) methods have traditionally focused on mitigating catastrophic forgetting through gradient-based retraining, an approach ill-suited for deployed agents that must adapt in real time. We introduce our Adaptive Teaching and Learning System (ATLAS), a dual-agent architecture that decouples reasoning (Teacher) from execution (Student) and incorporates a persistent learning memory that stores distilled guidance from experience. This informs the orchestration layer, enabling the system to dynamically adjust its operational strategies, such as supervision level or initial plan selection, at inference time. In doing so, ATLAS achieves gradient-free continual learning, shifting the locus of adaptation from model parameters to system-level orchestration. We formulate this as a system-centric paradigm for continual learning, where the objective is adaptive efficiency: maximizing task success while minimizing computational cost through inference-time orchestration rather than parameter updates. Evaluated on Microsoft's ExCyTIn-Bench, an open-source benchmark simulating complex cyberthreat investigation, ATLAS achieves 54.1% success with GPT-5-mini as its Student, outperforming the larger GPT-5 (High) by 13% while reducing cost by 86%. Cross-incident validation demonstrates generalization: frozen pamphlets from Incident #5 improve accuracy from 28% to 41% with zero retraining, while shifting output composition from verbose exploration to structured reasoning. Together, these findings establish gradient-free continual learning as a viable path toward adaptive, deployable AI systems and provide causally annotated traces valuable for training explicit world models.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 24 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2025.
Builds on
24 of 26 references.
References · 24
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
- 2018World Modelscited by 1,444
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
12 more
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
- 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
- 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Modelscited by 551
- 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 449
- 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 351
- 2025RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluationcited by 136
- 2024Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreementcited by 99
- 2023Explainable Reinforcement Learning via a Causal World Modelcited by 22
- 2025ExCyTIn-Bench: Evaluating LLM agents on Cyber Threat Investigationcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026OpenSec: Measuring Incident Response Agent Calibration Under Adversarial Evidencecited by 1
- 2026LLM Agents for Time-Series: A Surveycited by 1
- 2026APEX: Adaptive Principle EXtraction A Three-Layer Self-Evolution Framework for Production AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026LIMBO: Lifelong Inference-Time Memory and Budget Optimization for LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026LIMBO: Lifelong Inference-Time Memory and Budget Optimization for LLM Agents12 Sep 2026
- 2026LLM Agents for Time-Series: A Survey26 Aug 2026
- 2026APEX: Adaptive Principle EXtraction A Three-Layer Self-Evolution Framework for Production AI Agents13 Jun 2026
- 2026OpenSec: Measuring Incident Response Agent Calibration Under Adversarial Evidence28 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ContinualSkillBench: Can LLM Agents Truly Evolve Their Capabilities?
- 2026CLaaS: Continual learning as a service for sample efficient online learning
- 2026SkillLearnBench: Benchmarking Continual Learning Methods for Agent Skill Generation on Real-World Tasks
- 2026Learning to Continually Learn via Meta-learning Agentic Memory Designs
- 2026Position: Modular Memory is the Key to Continual Learning Agents
- 2025Towards Continuous Intelligence Growth: Self-Training, Continual Learning, and Dual-Scale Memory in SuperIntelliAgent
- 2024Continual Task Learning through Adaptive Policy Self-Composition
- 2024Demonstrating the Continual Learning Capabilities and Practical Application of Discrete-Time Active Inference