mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dataset-Adaptive Dimensionality Reduction

arXiv 2507.11984 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2025cs.HC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Selecting the appropriate dimensionality reduction (DR) technique and determining its optimal hyperparameter settings that maximize the accuracy of the output projections typically involves extensive trial and error, often resulting in unnecessary computational overhead. To address this challenge, we propose a dataset-adaptive approach to DR optimization guided by structural complexity metrics. These metrics quantify the intrinsic complexity of a dataset, predicting whether higher-dimensional spaces are necessary to represent it accurately. Since complex datasets are often inaccurately represented in two-dimensional projections, leveraging these metrics enables us to predict the maximum achievable accuracy of DR techniques for a given dataset, eliminating redundant trials in optimizing DR. We introduce the design and theoretical foundations of these structural complexity metrics. We quantitatively verify that our metrics effectively approximate the ground truth complexity of datasets and confirm their suitability for guiding dataset-adaptive DR workflow. Finally, we empirically show that our dataset-adaptive workflow significantly enhances the efficiency of DR optimization without compromising accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2025.

Builds on

22 of 76 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  3. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  4. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 390
  5. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 291
  6. 2019Topological Autoencoderscited by 127
  7. 2021Scikit-dimension: a Python package for intrinsic dimension estimationcited by 68
  8. 2018On the Intrinsic Dimensionality of Image Representationscited by 57
  9. 2020t-viSNE: Interactive Assessment and Interpretation of t-SNE Projectionscited by 43
  10. 2021Revisiting Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Visual Cluster Analysis: An Empirical Studycited by 27
  11. 2021Measuring and Explaining the Inter-Cluster Reliability of Multidimensional Projectionscited by 20
  12. 2018To Cluster, or Not to Cluster: An Analysis of Clusterability Methodscited by 17
10 more
  1. 2025Unveiling High-dimensional Backstage: A Survey for Reliable Visual Analytics with Dimensionality Reductioncited by 16
  2. 2023ZADU: A Python Library for Evaluating the Reliability of Dimensionality Reduction Embeddingscited by 15
  3. 2018Efficient Image Dataset Classification Difficulty Estimation for Predicting Deep-Learning Accuracycited by 14
  4. 2022Uniform Manifold Approximation with Two-phase Optimizationcited by 12
  5. 2023Classes are not Clusters: Improving Label-based Evaluation of Dimensionality Reductioncited by 11
  6. 2023CLAMS: A Cluster Ambiguity Measure for Estimating Perceptual Variability in Visual Clusteringcited by 8
  7. 2025A Critical Analysis of the Usage of Dimensionality Reduction in Four Domainscited by 7
  8. 2025Measuring the Validity of Clustering Validation Datasetscited by 6
  9. 2022Sanity Check for External Clustering Validation Benchmarks using Internal Validation Measurescited by 5
  10. 2019Interpreting Distortions in Dimensionality Reduction by Superimposing Neighbourhood Graphscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.