Interpreting Distortions in Dimensionality Reduction by Superimposing Neighbourhood Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To perform visual data exploration, many dimensionality reduction methods have been developed. These tools allow data analysts to represent multidimensional data in a 2D or 3D space, while preserving as much relevant information as possible. Yet, they cannot preserve all structures simultaneously and they induce some unavoidable distortions. Hence, many criteria have been introduced to evaluate a map's overall quality, mostly based on the preservation of neighbourhoods. Such global indicators are currently used to compare several maps, which helps to choose the most appropriate mapping method and its hyperparameters. However, those aggregated indicators tend to hide the local repartition of distortions. Thereby, they need to be supplemented by local evaluation to ensure correct interpretation of maps. In this paper, we describe a new method, called MING, for `Map Interpretation using Neighbourhood Graphs'. It offers a graphical interpretation of pairs of map quality indicators, as well as local evaluation of the distortions. This is done by displaying on the map the nearest neighbours graphs computed in the data space and in the embedding. Shared and unshared edges exhibit reliable and unreliable neighbourhood information conveyed by the mapping. By this mean, analysts may determine whether proximity (or remoteness) of points on the map faithfully represents similarity (or dissimilarity) of original data, within the meaning of a chosen map quality criteria. We apply this approach to two pairs of widespread indicators: precision/recall and trustworthiness/continuity, chosen for their wide use in the community, which will allow an easy handling by users.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2021Measuring and Explaining the Inter-Cluster Reliability of Multidimensional Projectionscited by 20
- 2021Visual Cluster Separation Using High-Dimensional Sharpened Dimensionality Reductioncited by 2
- 2025Dataset-Adaptive Dimensionality Reductioncited by 1
- 2025Identification of Patterns of Cognitive Impairment for Early Detection of Dementiacited by 0
- 2025Dataset-Adaptive Dimensionality Reduction16 Jul 2025
- 2025Identification of Patterns of Cognitive Impairment for Early Detection of Dementia29 May 2025
- 2021Visual Cluster Separation Using High-Dimensional Sharpened Dimensionality Reduction1 Oct 2021
- 2021Measuring and Explaining the Inter-Cluster Reliability of Multidimensional Projections16 Jul 2021