mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CLAMS: A Cluster Ambiguity Measure for Estimating Perceptual Variability in Visual Clustering

arXiv 2308.00284 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2023cs.HC cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual clustering is a common perceptual task in scatterplots that supports diverse analytics tasks (e.g., cluster identification). However, even with the same scatterplot, the ways of perceiving clusters (i.e., conducting visual clustering) can differ due to the differences among individuals and ambiguous cluster boundaries. Although such perceptual variability casts doubt on the reliability of data analysis based on visual clustering, we lack a systematic way to efficiently assess this variability. In this research, we study perceptual variability in conducting visual clustering, which we call Cluster Ambiguity. To this end, we introduce CLAMS, a data-driven visual quality measure for automatically predicting cluster ambiguity in monochrome scatterplots. We first conduct a qualitative study to identify key factors that affect the visual separation of clusters (e.g., proximity or size difference between clusters). Based on study findings, we deploy a regression module that estimates the human-judged separability of two clusters. Then, CLAMS predicts cluster ambiguity by analyzing the aggregated results of all pairwise separability between clusters that are generated by the module. CLAMS outperforms widely-used clustering techniques in predicting ground truth cluster ambiguity. Meanwhile, CLAMS exhibits performance on par with human annotators. We conclude our work by presenting two applications for optimizing and benchmarking data mining techniques using CLAMS. The interactive demo of CLAMS is available at clusterambiguity.dev.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.

Builds on

15 of 86 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  2. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 390
  3. 2017Accelerated Hierarchical Density Clusteringcited by 102
  4. 2017ActiVis: Visual Exploration of Industry-Scale Deep Neural Network Modelscited by 56
  5. 2021Revisiting Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Visual Cluster Analysis: An Empirical Studycited by 27
  6. 2021Measuring and Explaining the Inter-Cluster Reliability of Multidimensional Projectionscited by 20
  7. 2022Uniform Manifold Approximation with Two-phase Optimizationcited by 12
  8. 2022Feature Learning for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction toward Maximal Extraction of Hidden Patternscited by 8
  9. 2020Modeling the Influence of Visual Density on Cluster Perception in Scatterplots Using Topologycited by 7
  10. 2020Survey on Individual Differences in Visualizationcited by 5
  11. 2022Automatic Scatterplot Design Optimization for Clustering Identificationcited by 5
  12. 2022Sanity Check for External Clustering Validation Benchmarks using Internal Validation Measurescited by 5
3 more
  1. 2022Distortion-Aware Brushing for Reliable Cluster Analysis in Multidimensional Projectionscited by 3
  2. 2022The Risks of Ranking: Revisiting Graphical Perception to Model Individual Differences in Visualization Performancecited by 3
  3. 2023HPSCAN: Human Perception-Based Scattered Data Clusteringcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

8 papers.