mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Measuring and Explaining the Inter-Cluster Reliability of Multidimensional Projections

arXiv 2107.07859 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2021cs.LG cs.CV cs.HCcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose Steadiness and Cohesiveness, two novel metrics to measure the inter-cluster reliability of multidimensional projection (MDP), specifically how well the inter-cluster structures are preserved between the original high-dimensional space and the low-dimensional projection space. Measuring inter-cluster reliability is crucial as it directly affects how well inter-cluster tasks (e.g., identifying cluster relationships in the original space from a projected view) can be conducted; however, despite the importance of inter-cluster tasks, we found that previous metrics, such as Trustworthiness and Continuity, fail to measure inter-cluster reliability. Our metrics consider two aspects of the inter-cluster reliability: Steadiness measures the extent to which clusters in the projected space form clusters in the original space, and Cohesiveness measures the opposite. They extract random clusters with arbitrary shapes and positions in one space and evaluate how much the clusters are stretched or dispersed in the other space. Furthermore, our metrics can quantify pointwise distortions, allowing for the visualization of inter-cluster reliability in a projection, which we call a reliability map. Through quantitative experiments, we verify that our metrics precisely capture the distortions that harm inter-cluster reliability while previous metrics have difficulty capturing the distortions. A case study also demonstrates that our metrics and the reliability map 1) support users in selecting the proper projection techniques or hyperparameters and 2) prevent misinterpretation while performing inter-cluster tasks, thus allow an adequate identification of inter-cluster structure.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2021.

Builds on

7 of 77 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  2. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  3. 2019Topological Autoencoderscited by 127
  4. 2017Accelerated Hierarchical Density Clusteringcited by 102
  5. 2016Visualizing Large-scale and High-dimensional Datacited by 79
  6. 2020t-viSNE: Interactive Assessment and Interpretation of t-SNE Projectionscited by 43
  7. 2019Interpreting Distortions in Dimensionality Reduction by Superimposing Neighbourhood Graphscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 5.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023ZADU: A Python Library for Evaluating the Reliability of Dimensionality Reduction Embeddingscited by 15
  2. 2022Uniform Manifold Approximation with Two-phase Optimizationcited by 12
  3. 2023Classes are not Clusters: Improving Label-based Evaluation of Dimensionality Reductioncited by 11
  4. 2022Feature Learning for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction toward Maximal Extraction of Hidden Patternscited by 8
  5. 2023CLAMS: A Cluster Ambiguity Measure for Estimating Perceptual Variability in Visual Clusteringcited by 8
  6. 2025Stop Misusing t-SNE and UMAP for Visual Analyticscited by 8
  7. 2024"Normalized Stress" is Not Normalized: How to Interpret Stress Correctlycited by 5
  8. 2022Distortion-Aware Brushing for Reliable Cluster Analysis in Multidimensional Projectionscited by 3
  9. 2024FedNE: Surrogate-Assisted Federated Neighbor Embedding for Dimensionality Reductioncited by 1
  10. 2025Dataset-Adaptive Dimensionality Reductioncited by 1
  11. 2025GhostUMAP2: Measuring and Analyzing (r,d)-Stability of UMAPcited by 1
  12. 2025UMATO: Bridging Local and Global Structures for Reliable Visual Analytics with Dimensionality Reductioncited by 1
8 more
  1. 2025How Scale Breaks "Normalized Stress" and KL Divergence: Rethinking Quality Metricscited by 1
  2. 2025Navigating High-Dimensional Backstage: A Guide for Exploring Literature for the Reliable Use of Dimensionality Reductioncited by 0
  3. 2025Why Can't I See My Clusters? A Precision-Recall Approach to Dimensionality Reduction Validationcited by 0
  4. 2026Class Angular Distortion Index for Dimensionality Reductioncited by 0
  5. 2026FADEx: Feature Attribution and Distortion-based Explanation of Dimensionality Reductioncited by 0
  6. 2026Measuring Distortion in the Empty Regions of Dimensionality Reduction Scatterplots with the Gap Indexcited by 0
  7. 2026Understanding Differentiable Embeddings Through Differential and Integral Geometrycited by 0
  8. 2026A Fixed-Radius Distance-Band Benchmark for Dimensionality-Reduction Fidelitycited by 0