mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Simple and Adaptive Learning Rate for FTRL in Online Learning with Minimax Regret of Theta(T2/3) and its Application to Best-of-Both-Worlds

arXiv 2405.20028 ↗First posted 30 May 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) is a powerful framework for various online learning problems. By designing its regularizer and learning rate to be adaptive to past observations, FTRL is known to work adaptively to various properties of an underlying environment. However, most existing adaptive learning rates are for online learning problems with a minimax regret of Theta(√T) for the number of rounds T, and there are only a few studies on adaptive learning rates for problems with a minimax regret of Theta(T2/3), which include several important problems dealing with indirect feedback. To address this limitation, we establish a new adaptive learning rate framework for problems with a minimax regret of Theta(T2/3). Our learning rate is designed by matching the stability, penalty, and bias terms that naturally appear in regret upper bounds for problems with a minimax regret of Theta(T2/3). As applications of this framework, we consider three major problems with a minimax regret of Theta(T2/3): partial monitoring, graph bandits, and multi-armed bandits with paid observations. We show that FTRL with our learning rate and the Tsallis entropy regularizer improves existing Best-of-Both-Worlds (BOBW) regret upper bounds, which achieve simultaneous optimality in the stochastic and adversarial regimes. The resulting learning rate is surprisingly simple compared to the existing learning rates for BOBW algorithms for problems with a minimax regret of Theta(T2/3).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

Builds on

34 of 64 references.

References · 34

  1. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
  2. 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 123
  3. 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 118
  4. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  5. 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 91
  6. 2015Online Learning with Feedback Graphs: Beyond Banditscited by 79
  7. 2013Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Mustcited by 68
  8. 2019Beating Stochastic and Adversarial Semi-bandits Optimally and Simultaneouslycited by 53
  9. 2016An algorithm with nearly optimal pseudo-regret for both stochastic and adversarial banditscited by 47
  10. 2015Fighting Bandits with a New Kind of Smoothnesscited by 45
  11. 2019An Information-Theoretic Approach to Minimax Regret in Partial Monitoringcited by 41
  12. 2021The best of both worlds: stochastic and adversarial episodic MDPs with unknown transitioncited by 40
22 more
  1. 2013Bandits with Switching Costs: T^{2/3} Regretcited by 38
  2. 2020Adversarial Dueling Banditscited by 33
  3. 2023A Blackbox Approach to Best of Both Worlds in Bandits and Beyondcited by 29
  4. 2022Nearly Optimal Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithms for Online Learning with Feedback Graphscited by 26
  5. 2019Connections Between Mirror Descent, Thompson Sampling and the Information Ratiocited by 23
  6. 2018Efficient Online Portfolio with Logarithmic Regretcited by 20
  7. 2019Exploration by Optimisation in Partial Monitoringcited by 20
  8. 2022Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithms for Partial Monitoringcited by 19
  9. 2023Improved Best-of-Both-Worlds Guarantees for Multi-Armed Bandits: FTRL with General Regularizers and Multiple Optimal Armscited by 18
  10. 2022A Near-Optimal Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Online Learning with Feedback Graphscited by 17
  11. 2018Cleaning up the neighborhood: A full classification for adversarial partial monitoringcited by 16
  12. 2021Improved Analysis of the Tsallis-INF Algorithm in Stochastically Constrained Adversarial Bandits and Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 15
  13. 2023Stability-penalty-adaptive follow-the-regularized-leader: Sparsity, game-dependency, and best-of-both-worldscited by 15
  14. 2021Understanding Bandits with Graph Feedbackcited by 14
  15. 2022Best of Both Worlds Model Selectioncited by 11
  16. 2024Adaptive Learning Rate for Follow-the-Regularized-Leader: Competitive Analysis and Best-of-Both-Worldscited by 11
  17. 2015Regret Lower Bound and Optimal Algorithm in Finite Stochastic Partial Monitoringcited by 10
  18. 2015Gains and Losses are Fundamentally Different in Regret Minimization: The Sparse Casecited by 9
  19. 2016Online Learning to Rank with Top-k Feedbackcited by 7
  20. 2022Simultaneously Learning Stochastic and Adversarial Bandits with General Graph Feedbackcited by 6
  21. 2015Utility-based Dueling Bandits as a Partial Monitoring Gamecited by 4
  22. 2024Exploration by Optimization with Hybrid Regularizers: Logarithmic Regret with Adversarial Robustness in Partial Monitoringcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.