GenAI-based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning towards Distributed Agent Intelligence: A Generative-RL Agent Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent reinforcement learning faces fundamental challenges that conventional approaches have failed to overcome: exponentially growing joint action spaces, non-stationary environments where simultaneous learning creates moving targets, and partial observability that constrains coordination. Current methods remain reactive, employing stimulus-response mechanisms that fail when facing novel scenarios. We argue for a transformative paradigm shift from reactive to proactive multi-agent intelligence through generative AI-based reinforcement learning. This position advocates reconceptualizing agents not as isolated policy optimizers, but as sophisticated generative models capable of synthesizing complex multi-agent dynamics and making anticipatory decisions based on predictive understanding of future interactions. Rather than responding to immediate observations, generative-RL agents can model environment evolution, predict other agents' behaviors, generate coordinated action sequences, and engage in strategic reasoning accounting for long-term dynamics. This approach leverages pattern recognition and generation capabilities of generative AI to enable proactive decision-making, seamless coordination through enhanced communication, and dynamic adaptation to evolving scenarios. We envision this paradigm shift will unlock unprecedented possibilities for distributed intelligence, moving beyond individual optimization toward emergent collective behaviors representing genuine collaborative intelligence. The implications extend across autonomous systems, robotics, and human-AI collaboration, promising solutions to coordination challenges intractable under traditional reactive frameworks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 90 of its 172 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2025.
Builds on
90 of 172 references.
References · 90
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2018World Modelscited by 1,444
- 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
- 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
- 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 990
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
38 more
- 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 761
- 2021What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulationcited by 699
- 2024RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulationcited by 670
- 2023GAIA-1: A Generative World Model for Autonomous Drivingcited by 618
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
- 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
- 2024CogACT: A Foundational Vision-Language-Action Model for Synergizing Cognition and Action in Robotic Manipulationcited by 411
- 2016Tutorial on Variational Autoencoderscited by 404
- 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
- 2017Leveraging Demonstrations for Deep Reinforcement Learning on Robotics Problems with Sparse Rewardscited by 302
- 2023Tool Learning with Foundation Modelscited by 302
- 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 281
- 2024Diffusion Policy Policy Optimizationcited by 255
- 2022A Survey on Generative Diffusion Modelcited by 238
- 2024GenAD: Generative End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 225
- 2019PRECOG: PREdiction Conditioned On Goals in Visual Multi-Agent Settingscited by 178
- 2018Learning Attentional Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 170
- 2020Emergent Multi-Agent Communication in the Deep Learning Eracited by 168
- 2019Benchmarking Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 158
- 2017Deep Decentralized Multi-task Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning under Partial Observabilitycited by 143
- 2018Algorithmic Framework for Model-based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 138
- 2019Multi-Agent Tensor Fusion for Contextual Trajectory Predictioncited by 131
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Agent Systems: A Review of Challenges, Solutions and Applicationscited by 122
- 2023Generative AIcited by 119
- 2022SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 118
- 2024GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluationscited by 118
- 2021Counterfactual Generative Networkscited by 111
- 2022A Survey of Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning with Communicationcited by 103
- 2018Multi-Agent Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 99
- 2024LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 97
- 2022Deep Hierarchical Planning from Pixelscited by 96
- 2016Opponent Modeling in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 94
- 2017A Survey of Learning in Multiagent Environments: Dealing with Non-Stationaritycited by 93
- 2016The Predictron: End-To-End Learning and Planningcited by 92
- 2019Multi-Agent Game Abstraction via Graph Attention Neural Networkcited by 81
- 2024From Imitation to Refinement -- Residual RL for Precise Assemblycited by 80
50 most cited of 90 All 90 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.