Temporal Misalignment Attacks against Multimodal Perception in Autonomous Driving
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal fusion (MMF) plays a critical role in the perception of autonomous driving, which primarily fuses camera and LiDAR streams for a comprehensive and efficient scene understanding. However, its strict reliance on precise temporal synchronization exposes it to new vulnerabilities. In this paper, we introduce DejaVu, an attack that exploits the in-vehicular network to manipulate the integrity of time and create subtle temporal misalignments, severely degrading downstream MMF-based perception tasks. Our comprehensive attack analysis across different models and datasets reveals the sensors' task-specific imbalanced sensitivities: object detection is overly dependent on LiDAR inputs, while object tracking is highly reliant on the camera inputs. Consequently, with a single-frame LiDAR delay, an attacker can reduce the car detection mAP by up to 88.5%, while with a three-frame camera delay, multiple object tracking accuracy (MOTA) for car drops by 73%. We further demonstrated two attack scenarios using an automotive Ethernet testbed for hardware-in-the-loop validation and the Autoware stack for end-to-end AD simulation, demonstrating the feasibility of the DejaVu attack and its severe impact, such as collisions and phantom braking. Our code and artifacts are publicly available at: https://github.com/shahriar0651/DejaVu.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 16 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2025.
Builds on
16 of 64 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 15
- 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
- 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 850
- 2023End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontierscited by 490
- 2019Deep Multi-modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challengescited by 314
- 2022Multi-modal Sensor Fusion for Auto Driving Perception: A Surveycited by 76
- 2022You Can't See Me: Physical Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based Autonomous Vehicles Driving Frameworkscited by 32
- 2023Adversarial Illusions in Multi-Modal Embeddingscited by 29
- 2021Security Analysis of Camera-LiDAR Fusion Against Black-Box Attacks on Autonomous Vehiclescited by 26
- 2022Multi-modal Fusion Technology based on Vehicle Information: A Surveycited by 13
- 2023Fusion is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object Detectioncited by 11
- 2018State-of-the-Art Survey on In-Vehicle Network Communication (CAN-Bus) Security and Vulnerabilitiescited by 7
- 2024Revisiting Physical-World Adversarial Attack on Traffic Sign Recognition: A Commercial Systems Perspectivecited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AD2: Analysis and Detection of Adversarial Threats in Visual Perception for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems
- 2026Still Camouflage, Moving Illusion: View-Induced Trajectory Manipulation in Autonomous Driving
- 2026RESBev: Making BEV Perception More Robust
- 2026GraphBEV++: Multi-Modal Feature Alignment for Autonomous Driving
- 2021OPV2V: An Open Benchmark Dataset and Fusion Pipeline for Perception with Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication
- 2024M2DA: Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer Incorporating Driver Attention for Autonomous Driving
- 2026TACTIC: Temporal and Context-Aware LLM Tactical Planning for Roadside LiDAR Attacks
- 2026Transferable Spatial Temporal Coherence Adversarial Attack on Black-Box Vision Language Models for Autonomous Driving