mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TACTIC: Temporal and Context-Aware LLM Tactical Planning for Roadside LiDAR Attacks

arXiv 2609.39969 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.RO cs.AI cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physical LiDAR attacks are often evaluated using fixed primitives and manually selected parameters, despite their strong dependence on surrounding traffic. We present TACTIC, a scene-aware framework that uses a multimodal large language model (MLLM) to coordinate state-adaptive roadside LiDAR attacks. Under a gray-box threat model, TACTIC relies only on an attacker-operated roadside perception stack, without accessing the victim LiDAR's native point clouds or internal processing. Local perception provides metric vehicle states, while the MLLM combines these measurements with roadside imagery to infer relational traffic context and construct a semantic scene graph. Based on this representation, TACTIC selects and configures two complementary primitives: push-away, which shifts the perceived range of a lead vehicle, and phantom-obstacle braking, which triggers emergency braking through obstacle injection. Measured traffic states and empirically calibrated constraints ground the generated tactics in physically feasible operating regions. To accommodate MLLM latency, TACTIC overlaps reasoning and execution asynchronously while high-rate local perception detects scene changes and triggers replanning. Across 280 randomized CARLA trials, the full policy achieves a 100% collision rate, compared with 35% for a fixed rule, 60% for random selection, and 75% for a restricted LLM using mode selection with default parameters. Joint physical-and-image input achieves 100% success, versus 65% with physical measurements alone and 75% with imagery alone, while asynchronous Delta refresh reduces scene-mutation response from 7.4 s to 2.0 s. These results show that scene-dependent tactical planning can expose context-sensitive LiDAR failure modes that fixed attack policies may miss.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

13 of 25 references.

References · 13

  1. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  2. 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 567
  3. 2023DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answeringcited by 536
  4. 2017Scene Graph Generation by Iterative Message Passingcited by 462
  5. 2023GPT-Driver: Learning to Drive with GPTcited by 347
  6. 2023LMDrive: Closed-Loop End-to-End Driving with Large Language Modelscited by 305
  7. 2019Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 152
  8. 2020Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object Detectioncited by 137
  9. 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
  10. 2022You Can't See Me: Physical Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based Autonomous Vehicles Driving Frameworkscited by 32
  11. 2025LLM-attacker: Enhancing Closed-loop Adversarial Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving with Large Language Modelscited by 19
  12. 2025SoK: How Sensor Attacks Disrupt Autonomous Vehicles: An End-to-end Analysis, Challenges, and Missed Threatscited by 3
1 more
  1. 2026SEIDM: A Safe and Efficient Intelligent Driver Model for Autonomous Driving Behaviorcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Risk-Adaptive Edge--Cloud Visual Reasoning for Communication-Efficient Autonomous Driving
  2. 2025Temporal Misalignment Attacks against Multimodal Perception in Autonomous Driving
  3. 2023Exorcising ''Wraith'': Protecting LiDAR-based Object Detector in Automated Driving System from Appearing Attacks
  4. 2026LIDAR-AD: A Decoder-Free Latent-Interaction Dreamer with Action-Residual Chains for Autonomous Driving
  5. 2026Lost in Fog: Sensor Perturbations Expose Reasoning Fragility in Driving VLAs
  6. 2025Talk2PC: Enhancing 3D Visual Grounding through LiDAR and Radar Point Clouds Fusion for Autonomous Driving
  7. 2026Systematic Discovery of Semantic Attacks in Online Map Construction through Conditional Diffusion
  8. 2021Security Analysis of Camera-LiDAR Fusion Against Black-Box Attacks on Autonomous Vehicles