mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Every Rollout Counts: Optimal Resource Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Scaling

arXiv 2506.15707 ↗First posted 30 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 15

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-Time Scaling (TTS) improves the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) by using additional inference-time computation to explore multiple reasoning paths through search. Yet how to allocate a fixed rollout budget most effectively during search remains underexplored, often resulting in inefficient use of compute at test time. To bridge this gap, we formulate test-time search as a resource allocation problem and derive the optimal allocation strategy that maximizes the probability of obtaining a correct solution under a fixed rollout budget. Within this formulation, we reveal a core limitation of existing search methods: solution-level allocation tends to favor reasoning directions with more candidates, leading to theoretically suboptimal and inefficient use of compute. To address this, we propose Direction-Oriented Resource Allocation (DORA), a provably optimal method that mitigates this bias by decoupling direction quality from candidate count and allocating resources at the direction level. To demonstrate DORA's effectiveness, we conduct extensive experiments on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks including MATH500, AIME2024, and AIME2025. The empirical results show that DORA consistently outperforms strong baselines with comparable computational cost, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy. We hope our findings contribute to a broader understanding of optimal TTS for LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 31 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.

Builds on

31 of 59 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Can Pruning Improve Reasoning? Revisiting Long-CoT Compression with Capability in Mind for Better Reasoning20 May
  2. 2025ETS: Efficient Tree Search for Inference-Time Scaling19 Feb
  3. 2025Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimal17 Feb
  4. 2025Can 1B LLM Surpass 405B LLM? Rethinking Compute-Optimal Test-Time Scaling10 Feb
  5. 2024Forest-of-Thought: Scaling Test-Time Compute for Enhancing LLM Reasoning12 Dec
  6. 2024Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Reward-guided Tree Search18 Nov
  7. 2024TreeBoN: Enhancing Inference-Time Alignment with Speculative Tree-Search and Best-of-N Sampling18 Oct
  8. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug

Other references · 23

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  5. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,210
  6. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
  7. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
  8. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
  9. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 625
  10. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 500
  11. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
  12. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
11 more
  1. 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 388
  2. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 292
  3. 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 263
  4. 2022Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifiercited by 233
  5. 2025When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMscited by 183
  6. 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoningcited by 102
  7. 2024RL on Incorrect Synthetic Data Scales the Efficiency of LLM Math Reasoning by Eight-Foldcited by 99
  8. 2025PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward Modelscited by 99
  9. 2025A Sober Look at Progress in Language Model Reasoning: Pitfalls and Paths to Reproducibilitycited by 93
  10. 2023Don't throw away your value model! Generating more preferable text with Value-Guided Monte-Carlo Tree Search decodingcited by 60
  11. 2025DISC: Dynamic Decomposition Improves LLM Inference Scalingcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 11.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
  2. 2025Scaling over Scaling: Exploring Test-Time Scaling Plateau in Large Reasoning Models
  3. 2025SCALE: Selective Resource Allocation for Overcoming Performance Bottlenecks in Mathematical Test-time Scaling
  4. 2025Latency and Token-Aware Test-Time Compute
  5. 2025First Finish Search: Efficient Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models
  6. 2025Are We Scaling the Right Thing? A System Perspective on Test-Time Scaling
  7. 2025A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?
  8. 2025Scaling Test-time Compute for LLM Agents