mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CyclicReflex: Improving Reasoning Models via Cyclical Reflection Token Scheduling

arXiv 2506.11077 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large reasoning models (LRMs), such as OpenAI's o1 and DeepSeek-R1, harness test-time scaling to perform multi-step reasoning for complex problem-solving. This reasoning process, executed before producing final answers, is often guided by special juncture tokens that prompt self-evaluative reflection. These transition markers and reflective cues are referred to as "reflection tokens" (e.g., "wait", "but", "alternatively"). In this work, we treat reflection tokens as a "resource" and introduce the problem of resource allocation, aimed at improving the test-time compute performance of LRMs by adaptively regulating the frequency and placement of reflection tokens. Through empirical analysis, we show that both excessive and insufficient use of reflection tokens, referred to as over-reflection and under-reflection, can degrade model performance. To better understand this trade-off, we draw an analogy between reflection token usage and learning rate scheduling in optimization. Building on this insight, We propose cyclical reflection token scheduling (termed CyclicReflex), a training-free decoding strategy that dynamically modulates reflection token logits with a bidirectional, position-dependent triangular waveform, incurring no additional computation cost. Experiments on MATH500, AIME2024/2025, AMC2023, GPQA Diamond and LiveCodeBench demonstrate that CyclicReflex consistently improves performance across model sizes (1.5B-14B), outperforming standard decoding and recent approaches such as TIP (thought switching penalty) and S1. Codes are available at https://github.com/OPTML-Group/CyclicReflex.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 42 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.

Builds on

42 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 19

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Every Rollout Counts: Optimal Resource Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Scaling30 May
  2. 2025AlphaOne: Reasoning Models Thinking Slow and Fast at Test Time30 May
  3. 2025Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMs30 Apr
  4. 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models22 Apr
  5. 2025Speculative Thinking: Enhancing Small-Model Reasoning with Large Model Guidance at Inference Time12 Apr
  6. 2025SEAL: Steerable Reasoning Calibration of Large Language Models for Free7 Apr
  7. 2025ThinkPrune: Pruning Long Chain-of-Thought of LLMs via Reinforcement Learning2 Apr
  8. 2025Effectively Controlling Reasoning Models through Thinking Intervention31 Mar
  9. 2025L1: Controlling How Long A Reasoning Model Thinks With Reinforcement Learning6 Mar
  10. 2025Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-Certainty25 Feb
  11. 2025Can 1B LLM Surpass 405B LLM? Rethinking Compute-Optimal Test-Time Scaling10 Feb
  12. 2025Iterative Deepening Sampling as Efficient Test-Time Scaling8 Feb
7 more
  1. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  2. 2025Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Jan
  3. 2025O1-Pruner: Length-Harmonizing Fine-Tuning for O1-Like Reasoning Pruning22 Jan
  4. 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec
  5. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
  6. 2023Alphazero-like Tree-Search can Guide Large Language Model Decoding and Training29 Sep
  7. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models17 May

Other references · 23

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  5. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  6. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  7. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  8. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,210
  9. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
  10. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
  11. 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Modelscited by 574
  12. 2025Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 384
11 more
  1. 2025From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 320
  2. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHFcited by 267
  3. 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 135
  4. 2025OverThink: Slowdown Attacks on Reasoning LLMscited by 96
  5. 2023Rewarding Chatbots for Real-World Engagement with Millions of Userscited by 59
  6. 2014Linear Coupling: An Ultimate Unification of Gradient and Mirror Descentcited by 58
  7. 2025Landscape of Thoughts: Visualizing the Reasoning Process of Large Language Modelscited by 25
  8. 2015A geometric alternative to Nesterov's accelerated gradient descentcited by 22
  9. 2023Acceleration by Stepsize Hedging II: Silver Stepsize Schedule for Smooth Convex Optimizationcited by 20
  10. 2023Acceleration by Stepsize Hedging I: Multi-Step Descent and the Silver Stepsize Schedulecited by 19
  11. 2025"Well, Keep Thinking": Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Injection Decodingcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Stop Unnecessary Reflection: Training LRMs for Efficient Reasoning with Adaptive Reflection and Length Coordinated Penalty
  2. 2025Self-Reflective Generation at Test Time
  3. 2025First Try Matters: Revisiting the Role of Reflection in Reasoning Models
  4. 2026Reflection Steering: Disentangling Reflection from Reasoning in Activation Space for Token-Efficient Inference
  5. 2025ReflCtrl: Controlling LLM Reflection Efficiently via Representation Engineering
  6. 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach
  7. 2025Instruct-of-Reflection: Enhancing Large Language Models Iterative Reflection Capabilities via Dynamic-Meta Instruction
  8. 2025MM-HELIX: Boosting Multimodal Long-Chain Reflective Reasoning with Holistic Platform and Adaptive Hybrid Policy Optimization