mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Latency and Token-Aware Test-Time Compute

arXiv 2509.09864 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Inference-time scaling has emerged as a powerful way to improve large language model (LLM) performance by generating multiple candidate responses and selecting among them. However, existing work on dynamic allocation for test-time compute typically considers only parallel generation methods such as best-of-N, overlooking incremental decoding methods like beam search, and has largely ignored latency, focusing only on token usage. We formulate inference-time scaling as a problem of dynamic compute allocation and method selection, where the system must decide which strategy to apply and how much compute to allocate on a per-query basis. Our framework explicitly incorporates both token cost and wall-clock latency, the latter being critical for user experience and particularly for agentic workflows where models must issue multiple queries efficiently. Experiments on reasoning benchmarks show that our approach consistently outperforms static strategies, achieving favorable accuracy-cost trade-offs while remaining practical for deployment.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2025.

Builds on

13 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Scaling LLM Inference with Optimized Sample Compute Allocation29 Oct
  2. 2024Learning How Hard to Think: Input-Adaptive Allocation of LM Computation7 Oct
  3. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug

Other references · 10

  1. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  2. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  3. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
  4. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 633
  5. 2024RouterBench: A Benchmark for Multi-LLM Routing Systemcited by 222
  6. 2025When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMscited by 182
  7. 2025BEST-Route: Adaptive LLM Routing with Test-Time Optimal Computecited by 63
  8. 2025Causal LLM Routing: End-to-End Regret Minimization from Observational Datacited by 27
  9. 2025AdaBoN: Adaptive Best-of-N Alignmentcited by 8
  10. 2025Optimal Policy Minimum Bayesian Riskcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Faster and Better LLMs via Latency-Aware Test-Time Scaling
  2. 2025Are We Scaling the Right Thing? A System Perspective on Test-Time Scaling
  3. 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
  4. 2025textttSPECS: Faster Test-Time Scaling through Speculative Drafts
  5. 2025Every Rollout Counts: Optimal Resource Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Scaling
  6. 2025Scaling Test-time Compute for LLM Agents
  7. 2025First Finish Search: Efficient Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models
  8. 2025The Energy Cost of Reasoning: Analyzing Energy Usage in LLMs with Test-time Compute