PETS: A Principled Framework Towards Optimal Trajectory Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Self-Consistency
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time scaling can improve model performance by aggregating stochastic reasoning trajectories. However, achieving sample-efficient test-time self-consistency under a limited budget remains an open challenge. We introduce PETS (Principled and Efficient Test-TimeSelf-Consistency), which initiates a principled study of trajectory allocation through an optimization framework. Central to our approach is the self-consistency rate, a new measure defined as agreement with the infinite-budget majority vote. This formulation makes sample-efficient test-time allocation theoretically grounded and amenable to rigorous analysis. We study both offline and online settings. In the offline regime, where all questions are known in advance, we connect trajectory allocation to crowdsourcing, a classic and well-developed area, by modeling reasoning traces as workers. This perspective allows us to leverage rich existing theory, yielding theoretical guarantees and an efficient majority-voting-based allocation algorithm. In the online streaming regime, where questions arrive sequentially and allocations must be made on the fly, we propose a novel method inspired by the offline framework. Our approach adapts budgets to question difficulty while preserving strong theoretical guarantees and computational efficiency. Experiments show that PETS consistently outperforms uniform allocation. On GPQA, PETS achieves perfect self-consistency in both settings while reducing the sampling budget by up to 75% (offline) and 55% (online) relative to uniform allocation. Code is available at https://github.com/ZDCSlab/PETS.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.
Builds on
27 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 16
Same direction, newest first
- 2025QwenLong-L1.5: Post-Training Recipe for Long-Context Reasoning and Memory Management15 Dec
- 2025Deep Think with Confidence21 Aug
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card8 Aug
- 2025Strategic Scaling of Test-Time Compute: A Bandit Learning Approach15 Jun
- 2025Every Rollout Counts: Optimal Resource Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Scaling30 May
- 2025Plan and Budget: Effective and Efficient Test-Time Scaling on Reasoning Large Language Models22 May
- 2025ThinkPrune: Pruning Long Chain-of-Thought of LLMs via Reinforcement Learning2 Apr
- 2025Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Self-Calibration25 Feb
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
- 2025O1-Pruner: Length-Harmonizing Fine-Tuning for O1-Like Reasoning Pruning22 Jan
- 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec
- 2024Efficiently Scaling LLM Reasoning with Certaindex30 Dec
4 more
- 2024Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling30 Aug
- 2024Make Every Penny Count: Difficulty-Adaptive Self-Consistency for Cost-Efficient Reasoning24 Aug
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
- 2024Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoning19 Jan
Other references · 11
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 523
- 2024From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Modelscited by 136
- 2025Is Best-of-N the Best of Them? Coverage, Scaling, and Optimality in Inference-Time Alignmentcited by 91
- 2024Bayesian Calibration of Win Rate Estimation with LLM Evaluatorscited by 15
- 2025The Quest for Efficient Reasoning: A Data-Centric Benchmark to CoT Distillationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026What If We Allocate Test-Time Compute Adaptively?
- 2026Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning LLMs: Inference Regimes, Evaluation, and Reproducibility
- 2026Funnel of Thoughts: Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Early Voting and Rollout Pruning
- 2026ThinkFuse: Trajectory-Aware Test-Time Fusion for Small Reasoning Models
- 2025Scaling over Scaling: Exploring Test-Time Scaling Plateau in Large Reasoning Models
- 2026When to Vote, When to Rewrite: Disagreement-Guided Strategy Routing for Test-Time Scaling
- 2026Planned Test-Time Scaling with Coordinated Reasoning Paths
- 2026Agentic Aggregation for Parallel Scaling of Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks