SCALE: Selective Resource Allocation for Overcoming Performance Bottlenecks in Mathematical Test-time Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time compute scaling has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing mathematical reasoning in large language models (LLMs) by allocating additional computational resources during inference. However, current methods employ uniform resource distribution across all reasoning sub-problems, creating fundamental bottlenecks where challenging sub-problems receive insufficient attention while routine operations consume disproportionate resources. This uniform allocation creates performance bottlenecks where additional computational resources yield diminishing returns. Inspired by dual-process theory, we propose SCALE (Selective Resource Allocation), a framework that selectively allocates computational resources based on sub-problem difficulty. SCALE operates through four stages: (1) problem decomposition into sequential reasoning sub-problems, (2) difficulty assessment of each sub-problem to distinguish between routine operations and computationally challenging sub-problems, (3) selective processing mode assignment between System 1 for simple sub-problems and System 2 for complex ones, and (4) sequential execution with context propagation. By concentrating resources on challenging sub-problems while processing routine operations efficiently, SCALE achieves substantial performance improvements with superior resource utilization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SCALE significantly outperforms uniform scaling baselines, achieving accuracy improvements of up to 13.75 percentage points (57.50% to 71.25% on AIME25) while reducing computational costs by 33%-53%, representing a major advance in test-time scaling that addresses fundamental limitations of current approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2025.
Builds on
16 of 16 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2025KAT-V1: Kwai-AutoThink Technical Report11 Jul
- 2025TL;DR: Too Long, Do Re-weighting for Efficient LLM Reasoning Compression3 Jun
- 2025Self-Route: Automatic Mode Switching via Capability Estimation for Efficient Reasoning27 May
- 2025LIMOPro: Reasoning Refinement for Efficient and Effective Test-time Scaling25 May
- 2025ThinkSwitcher: When to Think Hard, When to Think Fast20 May
- 2025Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models20 Mar
- 2025DAST: Difficulty-Adaptive Slow-Thinking for Large Reasoning Models6 Mar
- 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
Other references · 7
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
- 2023Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 740
- 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 488
- 2025Think When You Need: Self-Adaptive Chain-of-Thought Learningcited by 37
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Scaling over Scaling: Exploring Test-Time Scaling Plateau in Large Reasoning Models
- 2025ARISE: An Adaptive Resolution-Aware Metric for Test-Time Scaling Evaluation in Large Reasoning Models
- 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
- 2025Are We Scaling the Right Thing? A System Perspective on Test-Time Scaling
- 2025Every Rollout Counts: Optimal Resource Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Scaling
- 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Complex Tasks: Where We Stand and What Lies Ahead
- 2025Mitigating Strategy-Selection Bias in Reasoning for More Effective Test-Time Scaling
- 2025Towards Thinking-Optimal Scaling of Test-Time Compute for LLM Reasoning