Safety-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Control via Risk-Sensitive Action-Value Iteration and Quantile Regression
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Safe and constrained RL
Abstract (arXiv)
Mainstream approximate action-value iteration reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms suffer from overestimation bias, leading to suboptimal policies in high-variance stochastic environments. Quantile-based action-value iteration methods reduce this bias by learning a distribution of the expected cost-to-go using quantile regression. However, ensuring that the learned policy satisfies safety constraints remains a challenge when these constraints are not explicitly integrated into the RL framework. Existing methods often require complex neural architectures or manual tradeoffs due to combined cost functions. To address this, we propose a risk-regularized quantile-based algorithm integrating Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) to enforce safety without complex architectures. We also provide theoretical guarantees on the contraction properties of the risk-sensitive distributional Bellman operator in Wasserstein space, ensuring convergence to a unique cost distribution. Simulations of a mobile robot in a dynamic reach-avoid task show that our approach leads to more goal successes, fewer collisions, and better safety-performance trade-offs than risk-neutral methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 17 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2025.
Builds on
17 of 34 references.
References · 17
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 785
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 474
- 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 337
- 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 328
- 2020Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile Criticscited by 165
- 2023Safety-Gymnasium: A Unified Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmarkcited by 143
- 2017A Tutorial on Kernel Density Estimation and Recent Advancescited by 101
- 2022Safe Reinforcement Learning by Imagining the Near Futurecited by 67
- 2022Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning via Constraining Conditional Value-at-Riskcited by 41
5 more
- 2019P3O: Policy-on Policy-off Policy Optimizationcited by 37
- 2019Entropic Risk Measure in Policy Searchcited by 19
- 2022Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with Exponential Criteriacited by 15
- 2024Model Predictive Control and Reinforcement Learning: A Unified Framework Based on Dynamic Programmingcited by 7
- 2023ROSARL: Reward-Only Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Tilted Quantile Gradient Updates for Quantile-Constrained Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Off-Policy Safe Reinforcement Learning with Constrained Optimistic Exploration
- 2026Safety-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Post-Training Reachability Verification for Robot Navigation
- 2026Sampling-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning
- 2026CAPSULE: Control-Theoretic Action Perturbations for Safe Uncertainty-Aware Reinforcement Learning
- 2026COP-Q: Safety-First Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control via Cholesky-Ordered Projection
- 2024Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Non-Markovian Safety Constraints
- 2024Towards Efficient Risk-Sensitive Policy Gradient: An Iteration Complexity Analysis