mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Non-Markovian Safety Constraints

arXiv 2405.03005 ↗First posted 5 May 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In safe Reinforcement Learning (RL), safety cost is typically defined as a function dependent on the immediate state and actions. In practice, safety constraints can often be non-Markovian due to the insufficient fidelity of state representation, and safety cost may not be known. We therefore address a general setting where safety labels (e.g., safe or unsafe) are associated with state-action trajectories. Our key contributions are: first, we design a safety model that specifically performs credit assignment to assess contributions of partial state-action trajectories on safety. This safety model is trained using a labeled safety dataset. Second, using RL-as-inference strategy we derive an effective algorithm for optimizing a safe policy using the learned safety model. Finally, we devise a method to dynamically adapt the tradeoff coefficient between reward maximization and safety compliance. We rewrite the constrained optimization problem into its dual problem and derive a gradient-based method to dynamically adjust the tradeoff coefficient during training. Our empirical results demonstrate that this approach is highly scalable and able to satisfy sophisticated non-Markovian safety constraints.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2024.

Builds on

23 of 34 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
  3. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  4. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  5. 2018Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Reviewcited by 466
  6. 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
  7. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  8. 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
  9. 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 156
  10. 2020Learning to Walk in the Real World with Minimal Human Effortcited by 103
  11. 2022Safe Reinforcement Learning by Imagining the Near Futurecited by 67
  12. 2021Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical Specificationscited by 65
11 more
  1. 2020Inverse Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
  2. 2018Penalizing side effects using stepwise relative reachabilitycited by 38
  3. 2019Conservative Agency via Attainable Utility Preservationcited by 35
  4. 2019Preferences Implicit in the State of the Worldcited by 33
  5. 2020Avoiding Side Effects in Complex Environmentscited by 24
  6. 2021Escaping from Zero Gradient: Revisiting Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Frank-Wolfe Policy Optimizationcited by 18
  7. 2022Benchmarking Constraint Inference in Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  8. 2022Learning Soft Constraints From Constrained Expert Demonstrationscited by 13
  9. 2023Benchmarking Actor-Critic Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Robotics Control with Action Constraintscited by 10
  10. 2022pyRDDLGym: From RDDL to Gym Environmentscited by 8
  11. 2020Avoiding Negative Side Effects due to Incomplete Knowledge of AI Systemscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.