mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MiCRo: Mixture Modeling and Context-aware Routing for Personalized Preference Learning

arXiv 2505.24846 ↗First posted 30 May 2025cs.AI cs.CLcited by 11

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reward modeling is a key step in building safe foundation models when applying reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to align Large Language Models (LLMs). However, reward modeling based on the Bradley-Terry (BT) model assumes a global reward function, failing to capture the inherently diverse and heterogeneous human preferences. Hence, such oversimplification limits LLMs from supporting personalization and pluralistic alignment. Theoretically, we show that when human preferences follow a mixture distribution of diverse subgroups, a single BT model has an irreducible error. While existing solutions, such as multi-objective learning with fine-grained annotations, help address this issue, they are costly and constrained by predefined attributes, failing to fully capture the richness of human values. In this work, we introduce MiCRo, a two-stage framework that enhances personalized preference learning by leveraging large-scale binary preference datasets without requiring explicit fine-grained annotations. In the first stage, MiCRo introduces context-aware mixture modeling approach to capture diverse human preferences. In the second stage, MiCRo integrates an online routing strategy that dynamically adapts mixture weights based on specific context to resolve ambiguity, allowing for efficient and scalable preference adaptation with minimal additional supervision. Experiments on multiple preference datasets demonstrate that MiCRo effectively captures diverse human preferences and significantly improves downstream personalization.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 30 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.

Builds on

30 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Rethinking Bradley-Terry Models in Preference-Based Reward Modeling: Foundations, Theory, and Alternatives7 Nov
  2. 2024Semi-Supervised Reward Modeling via Iterative Self-Training10 Sep
  3. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning19 Aug
  4. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts18 Jun
  5. 2024Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMs14 Jun
  6. 2024HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models12 Jun
  7. 2024DMoERM: Recipes of Mixture-of-Experts for Effective Reward Modeling2 Mar
  8. 2023Distributional Preference Learning: Understanding and Accounting for Hidden Context in RLHF13 Dec
  9. 2023SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHF9 Oct
  10. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment13 Apr
  11. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  12. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep
1 more
  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 17

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  4. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
  5. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
  6. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 291
  7. 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 261
  8. 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 192
  9. 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 175
  10. 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewardscited by 148
  11. 2023When the Majority is Wrong: Modeling Annotator Disagreement for Subjective Taskscited by 90
  12. 2024Aligning to Thousands of Preferences via System Message Generalizationcited by 84
5 more
  1. 2024PAL: Pluralistic Alignment Framework for Learning from Heterogeneous Preferencescited by 54
  2. 2024Robust Multi-Task Learning with Excess Riskscited by 24
  3. 2024Improving Context-Aware Preference Modeling for Language Modelscited by 22
  4. 2024Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models Through Hypervolume Maximizationcited by 20
  5. 2024Test-Time Alignment via Hypothesis Reweightingcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 10.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Using Context Is Not Enough: Test-Time Training for Personalized Reward Modeling
  2. 2026In-Context Reward Adaptation for Robust Preference Modeling
  3. 2025APLOT: Robust Reward Modeling via Adaptive Preference Learning with Optimal Transport
  4. 2024Beyond Bradley-Terry Models: A General Preference Model for Language Model Alignment
  5. 2025Direct Preference Optimization with Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences
  6. 2024Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences
  7. 2025LoRe: Personalizing LLMs via Low-Rank Reward Modeling
  8. 2025A Shared Low-Rank Adaptation Approach to Personalized RLHF