mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

In-Context Reward Adaptation for Robust Preference Modeling

arXiv 2605.30323 ↗First posted 28 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) typically relies on static reward models to align Large Language Models with human preferences. However, human values are inherently diverse and heterogeneous, and a single reward model often lacks the robustness required to generalize to unseen preference domains. While existing multi-reward frameworks attempt to address this, they are often restricted to a fixed set of known domains and fail to adapt to unseen human distributions without costly retraining. In this work, we propose In-Context Reward Adaptation, a transformer-based framework designed to model diverse and unseen human preferences on the fly. By leveraging the in-context learning capabilities of transformers, our approach adaptively infers the underlying reward structure from a small set of preference demonstrations. We demonstrate that while a standard transformer architecture is insufficient for this task by characterizing an asymptotic bias to the ground-truth, incorporating human response time as an auxiliary input signal enables the model to successfully adapt to preferences from previously unseen domains. Our findings show that this approach provides a more robust foundation for preference modeling, allowing for the representation of heterogeneous rewards and preference distribution shift, and offering a scalable path toward more flexible human-AI alignment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

Builds on

25 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregation30 Apr
  2. 2024MaxMin-RLHF: Alignment with Diverse Human Preferences14 Feb
  3. 2023The Alignment Ceiling: Objective Mismatch in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback31 Oct
  4. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback27 Jul
  5. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewards7 Jun

Other references · 20

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  3. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  4. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  5. 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
  6. 2023Trained Transformers Learn Linear Models In-Contextcited by 331
  7. 2023Transformers as Statisticians: Provable In-Context Learning with In-Context Algorithm Selectioncited by 291
  8. 2023Transformers learn to implement preconditioned gradient descent for in-context learningcited by 274
  9. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
  10. 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 245
  11. 2024A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignmentcited by 175
  12. 2023In-Context Convergence of Transformerscited by 112
8 more
  1. 2023How Many Pretraining Tasks Are Needed for In-Context Learning of Linear Regression?cited by 93
  2. 2023Transformers Learn to Achieve Second-Order Convergence Rates for In-Context Linear Regressioncited by 47
  3. 2024Aligning Language Models with Demonstrated Feedbackcited by 32
  4. 2025SynthesizeMe! Inducing Persona-Guided Prompts for Personalized Reward Models in LLMscited by 26
  5. 2024How Well Can Transformers Emulate In-context Newton's Method?cited by 23
  6. 2024Guided Profile Generation Improves Personalization with LLMscited by 19
  7. 2023'Generative CI' through Collective Response Systemscited by 13
  8. 2024Enhancing Preference-based Linear Bandits via Human Response Timecited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
  2. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning
  3. 2026Using Context Is Not Enough: Test-Time Training for Personalized Reward Modeling
  4. 2025Influencing Humans to Conform to Preference Models for RLHF
  5. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  6. 2025PaTaRM: Bridging Pairwise and Pointwise Signals via Preference-Aware Task-Adaptive Reward Modeling
  7. 2025PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling
  8. 2026Bayesian Preference Learning for Test-Time Steerable Reward Models