mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Using Context Is Not Enough: Test-Time Training for Personalized Reward Modeling

arXiv 2609.35109 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) aligns large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, yet most pipelines learn a single reward model that overlooks individual differences in preferences. Personalized reward models (PRMs) address this by conditioning rewards on user-specific feedback, most commonly through in-context learning (ICL), where a user's historical comparisons are supplied as contextual preference pairs. However, we identify a key limitation of ICL-based PRMs: they fail to capture the preference relations conveyed by contextual pairs. To address this, we propose Preference-Aligned Test-Time Training (P-TTT), which explicitly encodes these relations into user-specific fast weights for personalized reward prediction. P-TTT introduces sequence-level update and apply operations to match the response-level granularity of preference feedback, together with a preference-aligned objective that directly uses pairwise preference relations to guide fast-weight adaptation. Notably, P-TTT is simple to implement and computationally efficient, updating fast weights within a single forward pass without inference-time backpropagation. Extensive experiments show that P-TTT more effectively captures historical preference relations and outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 23 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

23 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Swap-guided Preference Learning for Personalized Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback13 Mar
  2. 2025A Shared Low-Rank Adaptation Approach to Personalized RLHF24 Mar
  3. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning19 Aug
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 19

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
  4. 2024Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden Statescited by 355
  5. 2024Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Timecited by 328
  6. 2024Personalization of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 104
  7. 2023Group Preference Optimization: Few-Shot Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 63
  8. 2024PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferencescited by 60
  9. 2025Language Model Personalization via Reward Factorizationcited by 31
  10. 2025SynthesizeMe! Inducing Persona-Guided Prompts for Personalized Reward Models in LLMscited by 29
  11. 2026In-Place Test-Time Trainingcited by 20
  12. 2025Let's (not) just put things in Context: Test-Time Training for Long-Context LLMscited by 18
7 more
  1. 2026Test-Time Training with KV Binding Is Secretly Linear Attentioncited by 13
  2. 2025CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMscited by 10
  3. 2025Learning to summarize user information for personalized reinforcement learning from human feedbackcited by 10
  4. 2025Test-Time Alignment for Tracking User Interest Shifts in Sequential Recommendationcited by 5
  5. 2026One Adapts to Any: Meta Reward Modeling for Personalized LLM Alignmentcited by 5
  6. 2026Test-Time Training with Next-Token Predictioncited by 2
  7. 2026Rethinking Personalized Reward Modeling for LLMs under Preference Heterogeneity via Group-Debiased Federated Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
  2. 2026In-Context Reward Adaptation for Robust Preference Modeling
  3. 2024ICPL: Few-shot In-context Preference Learning via LLMs
  4. 2026P-GenRM: Personalized Generative Reward Model with Test-time User-based Scaling
  5. 2024Personalized Adaptation via In-Context Preference Learning
  6. 2025PersRM-R1: Enhance Personalized Reward Modeling with Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025LoRe: Personalizing LLMs via Low-Rank Reward Modeling
  8. 2026Personalized RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models with Human Aligned Personalization