ToMAP: Training Opponent-Aware LLM Persuaders with Theory of Mind
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising potential in persuasion, but existing works on training LLM persuaders are still preliminary. Notably, while humans are skilled in modeling their opponent's thoughts and opinions proactively and dynamically, current LLMs struggle with such Theory of Mind (ToM) reasoning, resulting in limited diversity and opponent awareness. To address this limitation, we introduce Theory of Mind Augmented Persuader (ToMAP), a novel approach for building more flexible persuader agents by incorporating two theory of mind modules that enhance the persuader's awareness and analysis of the opponent's mental state. Specifically, we begin by prompting the persuader to consider possible objections to the target central claim, and then use a text encoder paired with a trained MLP classifier to predict the opponent's current stance on these counterclaims. Our carefully designed reinforcement learning schema enables the persuader learns how to analyze opponent-related information and utilize it to generate more effective arguments. Experiments show that the ToMAP persuader, while containing only 3B parameters, outperforms much larger baselines, like GPT-4o, with a relative gain of 39.4% across multiple persuadee models and diverse corpora. Notably, ToMAP exhibits complex reasoning chains and reduced repetition during training, which leads to more diverse and effective arguments. The opponent-aware feature of ToMAP also makes it suitable for long conversations and enables it to employ more logical and opponent-aware strategies. These results underscore our method's effectiveness and highlight its potential for developing more persuasive language agents. Code is available at: https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/ToMAP.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.
Builds on
49 of 84 references.
References · 49
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
- 2025RAGEN: Understanding Self-Evolution in LLM Agents via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 386
- 2017Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialoguescited by 209
- 2019Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Goodcited by 209
37 more
- 2023FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactionscited by 171
- 2022Maieutic Prompting: Logically Consistent Reasoning with Recursive Explanationscited by 159
- 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoningcited by 154
- 2025CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaboratorscited by 124
- 2016Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussionscited by 110
- 2023Think Twice: Perspective-Taking Improves Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind Capabilitiescited by 89
- 2024Tell Me More! Towards Implicit User Intention Understanding of Language Model Driven Agentscited by 74
- 2024ToMBench: Benchmarking Theory of Mind in Large Language Modelscited by 72
- 2024Hidden Persuaders: LLMs' Political Leaning and Their Influence on Voterscited by 71
- 2023HI-TOM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Higher-Order Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 63
- 2024LLMs achieve adult human performance on higher-order theory of mind taskscited by 61
- 2024OpenToM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Theory-of-Mind Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 54
- 2024Internal Consistency and Self-Feedback in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 50
- 2023The Persuasive Power of Large Language Modelscited by 47
- 2024Persuasion with Large Language Models: A Survey of Empirical Evidence, Study Methodologies, and Ethical Implicationscited by 32
- 2024Measuring and Benchmarking Large Language Models' Capabilities to Generate Persuasive Languagecited by 31
- 2024Large Language Models are as persuasive as humans, but how? About the cognitive effort and moral-emotional language of LLM argumentscited by 30
- 2020Effects of Persuasive Dialogues: Testing Bot Identities and Inquiry Strategiescited by 29
- 2024Debate-to-Write: A Persona-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Diverse Argument Generationcited by 29
- 2025Hypothesis-Driven Theory-of-Mind Reasoning for Large Language Modelscited by 29
- 2023COKE: A Cognitive Knowledge Graph for Machine Theory of Mindcited by 27
- 2025Persuade Me if You Can: A Framework for Evaluating Persuasion Effectiveness and Susceptibility Among Large Language Modelscited by 27
- 2023Learning to Break: Knowledge-Enhanced Reasoning in Multi-Agent Debate Systemcited by 26
- 2024Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Conversational Task-Solvingcited by 24
- 2025Active Task Disambiguation with LLMscited by 23
- 2025AutoToM: Scaling Model-based Mental Inference via Automated Agent Modelingcited by 23
- 2024Do LLMs Exhibit Human-Like Reasoning? Evaluating Theory of Mind in LLMs for Open-Ended Responsescited by 22
- 2024Perceptions to Beliefs: Exploring Precursory Inferences for Theory of Mind in Large Language Modelscited by 22
- 2020Refine and Imitate: Reducing Repetition and Inconsistency in Persuasion Dialogues via Reinforcement Learning and Human Demonstrationcited by 20
- 2024Measuring and Improving Persuasiveness of Large Language Modelscited by 20
- 2024Teaching Models to Balance Resisting and Accepting Persuasioncited by 19
- 2025PersuasiveToM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Theory of Mind in Persuasive Dialoguescited by 17
- 2024Zero-shot Persuasive Chatbots with LLM-Generated Strategies and Information Retrievalcited by 14
- 2024Cohesive Conversations: Enhancing Authenticity in Multi-Agent Simulated Dialoguescited by 11
- 2025Persuasion Should be Double-Blind: A Multi-Domain Dialogue Dataset With Faithfulness Based on Causal Theory of Mindcited by 8
- 2025AI Realtor: Towards Grounded Persuasive Language Generation for Automated Copywritingcited by 6
- 2025Strategic Planning and Rationalizing on Trees Make LLMs Better Debaterscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 9.
12 papers.
- 2025Self-Aligned Reward: Towards Effective and Efficient Reasonerscited by 7
- 2026RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mindcited by 6
- 2026DRPG (Decompose, Retrieve, Plan, Generate): An Agentic Framework for Academic Rebuttalcited by 5
- 2025SeeingEye: Agentic Information Flow Unlocks Multimodal Reasoning In Text-only LLMscited by 3
- 2025GTAlign: Game-Theoretic Alignment of LLM Assistants for Social Welfarecited by 2
- 2026Cliff: Learning Process Rewards from the First Mistakecited by 1
- 2026You Only Align Once: Propagating Cooperative Behaviors in Multi-Agent Systems through Seed Agentscited by 0
- 2026Psi-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialoguescited by 0
- 2026A Model of Multi-turn Human Persuadability Using Probabilistic Belief Tracingcited by 0
- 2026Towards High-Level Semantic Intelligencecited by 0
- 2026ARGUS: Theory-of-Mind Guided Argument Generation with Strategy-Aware Planning and Knowledge Groundingcited by 0
- 2026Belief Cascades Drive Persuasion in LLM Agent Networkscited by 0
- 2026Cliff: Learning Process Rewards from the First Mistake2 Sep 2026
- 2026Belief Cascades Drive Persuasion in LLM Agent Networks25 Aug 2026
- 2026ARGUS: Theory-of-Mind Guided Argument Generation with Strategy-Aware Planning and Knowledge Grounding6 Aug 2026
- 2026Towards High-Level Semantic Intelligence27 Jul 2026
- 2026A Model of Multi-turn Human Persuadability Using Probabilistic Belief Tracing3 Jun 2026
- 2026Psi-Bench: Evaluating Persona-Sensitive Influencing in Persuasive Dialogues1 Jun 2026
- 2026You Only Align Once: Propagating Cooperative Behaviors in Multi-Agent Systems through Seed Agents26 May 2026
- 2026DRPG (Decompose, Retrieve, Plan, Generate): An Agentic Framework for Academic Rebuttal26 Jan 2026
- 2026RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind22 Jan 2026
- 2025SeeingEye: Agentic Information Flow Unlocks Multimodal Reasoning In Text-only LLMs29 Oct 2025
- 2025GTAlign: Game-Theoretic Alignment of LLM Assistants for Social Welfare10 Oct 2025
- 2025Self-Aligned Reward: Towards Effective and Efficient Reasoners5 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Towards Strategic Persuasion with Language Models
- 2026Theory of Mind and Persuasion Beyond Conversation: Assessing the Capacity of LLMs to Induce Belief States via Planning and Action
- 2026Learning to Persuade Exposes How Easily LLMs Abandon Correct Beliefs
- 2025Do Large Language Models Have a Planning Theory of Mind? Evidence from MindGames: a Multi-Step Persuasion Task
- 2025Large Language Models as Theory of Mind Aware Generative Agents with Counterfactual Reflection
- 2025Decompose-ToM: Enhancing Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models through Simulation and Task Decomposition
- 2025On the Adaptive Psychological Persuasion of Large Language Models
- 2025Effects of Theory of Mind and Prosocial Beliefs on Steering Human-Aligned Behaviors of LLMs in Ultimatum Games