mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DRPG (Decompose, Retrieve, Plan, Generate): An Agentic Framework for Academic Rebuttal

arXiv 2601.18081 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in scientific research workflows, automated support for academic rebuttal, a crucial step in academic communication and peer review, remains largely underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on off-the-shelf LLMs or simple pipelines, which struggle with long-context understanding and often fail to produce targeted and persuasive responses. In this paper, we propose DRPG, an agentic framework for automatic academic rebuttal generation that operates through four steps: Decompose reviews into atomic concerns, Retrieve relevant evidence from the paper, Plan rebuttal strategies, and Generate responses accordingly. Notably, the Planner in DRPG reaches over 98% accuracy in identifying the most feasible rebuttal direction. Experiments on data from top-tier conferences demonstrate that DRPG significantly outperforms existing rebuttal pipelines and achieves performance beyond the average human level using only an 8B model. Our analysis further demonstrates the effectiveness of the planner design and its value in providing multi-perspective and explainable suggestions. We also showed that DRPG works well in a more complex multi-round setting. These results highlight the effectiveness of DRPG and its potential to provide high-quality rebuttal content and support the scaling of academic discussions. Codes for this work are available at https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/DRPG-RebuttalAgent.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 31 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.

Builds on

31 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants8 Jan

Other references · 30

  1. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  2. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  3. 2019Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Goodcited by 209
  4. 2023Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysiscited by 200
  5. 2024CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Reviewcited by 148
  6. 2025LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Researchcited by 83
  7. 2024LLM Discussion: Enhancing the Creativity of Large Language Models via Discussion Framework and Role-Playcited by 66
  8. 2023Elo Uncovered: Robustness and Best Practices in Language Model Evaluationcited by 61
  9. 2025Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A surveycited by 61
  10. 2024ResearchTown: Simulator of Human Research Communitycited by 37
  11. 2021DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussionscited by 36
  12. 2025TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Reviewcited by 31
18 more
  1. 2024Debate-to-Write: A Persona-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Diverse Argument Generationcited by 29
  2. 2025ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviewscited by 25
  3. 2025Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussionscited by 23
  4. 2021Open-domain clarification question generation without question examplescited by 20
  5. 2024Teaching Models to Balance Resisting and Accepting Persuasioncited by 19
  6. 2023Exploring Jiu-Jitsu Argumentation for Writing Peer Review Rebuttalscited by 18
  7. 2024Argumentative Experience: Reducing Confirmation Bias on Controversial Issues through LLM-Generated Multi-Persona Debatescited by 15
  8. 2024Generative Adversarial Reviews: When LLMs Become the Criticcited by 12
  9. 2025ToMAP: Training Opponent-Aware LLM Persuaders with Theory of Mindcited by 12
  10. 2018Answerer in Questioner's Mind: Information Theoretic Approach to Goal-Oriented Visual Dialogcited by 11
  11. 2025Towards Strategic Persuasion with Language Modelscited by 10
  12. 2019A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttalcited by 8
  13. 2025AI Realtor: Towards Grounded Persuasive Language Generation for Automated Copywritingcited by 6
  14. 2024Enhancing Decision-Making in Optimization through LLM-Assisted Inference: A Neural Networks Perspectivecited by 5
  15. 2025Generative AI in Academic Writing: A Comparison of DeepSeek, Qwen, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and Gemmacited by 5
  16. 2025InspireDebate: Multi-Dimensional Subjective-Objective Evaluation-Guided Reasoning and Optimization for Debatingcited by 4
  17. 2024Learning to Ask Critical Questions for Assisting Product Searchcited by 3
  18. 2025Strategic Planning and Rationalizing on Trees Make LLMs Better Debaterscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance
  2. 2026RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation
  3. 2026RebuttalAgent: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of Mind
  4. 2026LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform
  5. 2025Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework
  6. 2026InternReviewer & InternAdvocate: Objective Reward and Evaluation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning in Peer Review and Rebuttal
  7. 2026From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent
  8. 2026EGTR-Review: Efficient Evidence-Grounded Scientific Peer Review Generation via Multi-Agent Teacher Distillation