MOSLIM:Align with diverse preferences in prompts through reward classification
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
The multi-objective alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for ensuring foundational models conform to diverse human preferences. Current research in this field typically involves either multiple policies or multiple reward models customized for various preferences, or the need to train a preference-specific supervised fine-tuning (SFT) model. In this work, we introduce a novel multi-objective alignment method, MOSLIM, which utilizes a single reward model and policy model to address diverse objectives. MOSLIM provides a flexible way to control these objectives through prompting and does not require preference training during SFT phase, allowing thousands of off-the-shelf models to be directly utilized within this training framework. MOSLIM leverages a multi-head reward model that classifies question-answer pairs instead of scoring them and then optimize policy model with a scalar reward derived from a mapping function that converts classification results from reward model into reward scores. We demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method across several multi-objective benchmarks and conduct ablation studies on various reward model sizes and policy optimization methods. The MOSLIM method outperforms current multi-objective approaches in most results while requiring significantly fewer GPU computing resources compared with existing policy optimization methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 22 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.
Builds on
22 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Online Merging Optimizers for Boosting Rewards and Mitigating Tax in Alignment28 May
- 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment29 Feb
- 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustment15 Feb
- 2024Aligning Crowd Feedback via Distributional Preference Reward Modeling15 Feb
- 2024Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback7 Feb
- 2023Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization5 Oct
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 15
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 406
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 280
- 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 243
- 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 132
- 2024The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 88
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Preference Orchestrator: Prompt-Aware Multi-Objective Alignment for Large Language Models
- 2026Meta-Aligner: Bidirectional Preference-Policy Optimization for Multi-Objective LLMs Alignment
- 2025Sentence-level Reward Model can Generalize Better for Aligning LLM from Human Preference
- 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
- 2025PIRA: Preference-Oriented Instruction-Tuned Reward Models with Dual Aggregation
- 2025UC-MOA: Utility-Conditioned Multi-Objective Alignment for Distributional Pareto-Optimality
- 2026RMGAP: Benchmarking the Generalization of Reward Models across Diverse Preferences
- 2024Transforming and Combining Rewards for Aligning Large Language Models