Preference Orchestrator: Prompt-Aware Multi-Objective Alignment for Large Language Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse natural language processing tasks, aligning these models with varying human preferences across multiple objectives remains a significant challenge in practical deployments. Existing multi-objective alignment methods rely on manually specified preference weights, which not only burden users with difficult preference specification tasks but also lead to suboptimal training efficiency due to exploration of irrelevant preference combinations. To alleviate these issues, we propose a novel framework named PRO, i.e., PReference Orchestrator, which features a lightweight preference adapter that automatically infers prompt-specific preference weights during both training and deployment phases. Specifically, the adapter automatically learns appropriate preference weights for each prompt by training on normalized reward scores from multiple reward models for preferred responses, which inherently reflect effective preference balances across objectives. Additionally, We provide theoretical analysis proving that our prompt-aware preference mechanism achieves superior performance compared to fixed preference weights in multi-objective alignment scenarios. Extensive experiments across multiple tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method over existing multi-objective alignment approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 12 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.
Builds on
12 of 47 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier22 Feb
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
Other references · 10
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
- 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 388
- 2025Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 291
- 2024MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialoguescited by 247
- 2024Controllable Text Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Meta-Aligner: Bidirectional Preference-Policy Optimization for Multi-Objective LLMs Alignment
- 2026MATO: Multi-objective Personalized Alignment with Test-time Optimization for Large Language Models
- 2026Reward-free Alignment for Conflicting Objectives
- 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs
- 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2025AMoPO: Adaptive Multi-objective Preference Optimization without Reward Models and Reference Models
- 2025Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewards
- 2025MAVIS: Multi-Objective Alignment via Inference-Time Value-Guided Selection