Meta-Aligner: Bidirectional Preference-Policy Optimization for Multi-Objective LLMs Alignment
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-Objective Alignment aims to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with diverse and often conflicting human values by optimizing multiple objectives simultaneously. Existing methods predominantly rely on static preference weight construction strategies. However, rigidly aligning to fixed targets discards valuable intermediate information, as training responses inherently embody valid preference trade-offs even when deviating from the target. To address this limitation, we propose Meal, i.e., MEta ALigner, a bi-level meta-learning framework enabling bidirectional optimization between preferences and policy responses, generating instructive dynamic preferences for steadier training. Specifically, we introduce a preference-weight-net as a meta-learner to generate adaptive preference weights based on input prompts and update the preference weights as learnable parameters, while the LLM policy acts as a base-learner optimizing response generation conditioned on these preferences with rejection sampling strategy. Extensive empirical results demonstrate that our method achieves superior performance on several multi-objective benchmarks, validating the effectiveness of the dynamic bidirectional preference-policy optimization framework.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.
Builds on
9 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 8
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
- 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 388
- 2025Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 291
- 2024Controllable Text Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026A Better Spur Should Start From Each Objectivecited by 1
- 2026A Better Spur Should Start From Each Objective8 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Preference Orchestrator: Prompt-Aware Multi-Objective Alignment for Large Language Models
- 2024MetaAligner: Towards Generalizable Multi-Objective Alignment of Language Models
- 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs
- 2026Meta-Learning Preferences for Multilingual LLM Alignment
- 2024MetaAlign: Align Large Language Models with Diverse Preferences during Inference Time
- 2025Alignment through Meta-Weighted Online Sampling: Bridging the Gap between Data Generation and Preference Optimization
- 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
- 2025Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewards