What CLIP Knows but Cannot Say: Recovering Negation from Frozen Intermediate Features
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP
Abstract (arXiv)
Contrastive vision-language models such as CLIP map semantically opposite phrases (e.g., "a dog" vs. "not a dog") to nearly identical embeddings, rendering them insensitive to negation. We attribute this failure to a phenomenon we call Representational Collapse: by tracking compositional divergence and visual alignment across the CLIP text encoder, we show that middle layers build compositional syntax, but the final layers collapse this structure as visual alignment rises, producing a syntax-blind final representation. To recover the lost negation signal without altering pretrained weights, we propose PeakPatch, a lightweight post-hoc correction system that intercepts the encoder at its compositional peak. An Embedding Correction Network (ECN) uses cross-attention to extract a negation-specific signal from the peak layer, anchored to a stable baseline, and predicts a deviation vector that re-injects the lost syntax into the final-layer embedding space. A complementary Score Correction Network (SCN) predicts bounded scalar score offsets for discriminative tasks. Both modules are trained jointly end-to-end while all CLIP parameters remain frozen, adding only 5.2M parameters (3.5% of the backbone) and preserving the standard cosine similarity interface. On NegBench, PeakPatch achieves 74.3% on COCO MCQ (+35.1 over CLIP, +17.8 over the best encoder fine-tuning method) and 65.5% on VOC MCQ, while outperforming all fine-tuning baselines on fully out-of-distribution negation retrieval despite training only 3.5% of the parameters. The corrected embeddings also transfer to text-to-image generation (+18.4 negation score) and generalize across ViT-B/32, ViT-L/14, and SigLIP backbones. Project URL: https://stevencylu.github.io/PeakPatch/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 55 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2026.
Builds on
55 of 62 references.
Closest ancestors · 12
Same direction, newest first
- 2025SpaceVLM: Sub-Space Modeling of Negation in Vision-Language Models15 Nov
- 2025Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negation16 Jan
- 2024AMU-Tuning: Effective Logit Bias for CLIP-based Few-shot Learning13 Apr
- 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionality26 Jun
- 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?13 Dec
- 2022SuS-X: Training-Free Name-Only Transfer of Vision-Language Models28 Nov
- 2022Task Residual for Tuning Vision-Language Models18 Nov
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?4 Oct
- 2022Tip-Adapter: Training-free Adaption of CLIP for Few-shot Classification19 Jul
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
- 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters9 Oct
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep
Other references · 43
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
31 more
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
- 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,209
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
- 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,147
- 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 811
- 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 786
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
- 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
- 2021FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Modelcited by 646
- 2021CLIP4Clip: An Empirical Study of CLIP for End to End Video Clip Retrievalcited by 645
- 2022GroupViT: Semantic Segmentation Emerges from Text Supervisioncited by 529
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
- 2021Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Promptscited by 509
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 189
- 2022DetCLIP: Dictionary-Enriched Visual-Concept Paralleled Pre-training for Open-world Detectioncited by 176
- 2021VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomenacited by 134
- 2023GALIP: Generative Adversarial CLIPs for Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 84
- 2023Not All Features Matter: Enhancing Few-shot CLIP with Adaptive Prior Refinementcited by 84
- 2023Dense and Aligned Captions (DAC) Promote Compositional Reasoning in VL Modelscited by 72
- 2024LP++: A Surprisingly Strong Linear Probe for Few-Shot CLIPcited by 60
- 2022An Analysis of Negation in Natural Language Understanding Corporacited by 39
- 2023Structure-CLIP: Towards Scene Graph Knowledge to Enhance Multi-modal Structured Representationscited by 37
- 2025Know "No" Better: A Data-Driven Approach for Enhancing Negation Awareness in CLIPcited by 26
- 2025Is CLIP ideal? No. Can we fix it? Yes!cited by 20
- 2024How and where does CLIP process negation?cited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Not Just What's There: Enabling CLIP to Comprehend Negated Visual Descriptions Without Fine-tuning
- 2026Omni-NegCLIP: Enhancing CLIP with Front-Layer Contrastive Fine-Tuning for Comprehensive Negation Understanding
- 2026When Negation Is a Geometry Problem in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Enhancing Compositional Reasoning in CLIP via Reconstruction and Alignment of Text Descriptions
- 2026Revisiting Compositionality in Dual-Encoder Vision-Language Models: The Role of Inference
- 2025VITRIX-CLIPIN: Enhancing Fine-Grained Visual Understanding in CLIP via Instruction Editing Data and Long Captions
- 2026Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive Learning
- 2026CLIP Is Shortsighted: Paying Attention Beyond the First Sentence