mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ORCA: Hunting Compositional Failures in Text-to-Image Diffusion

arXiv 2610.09841 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image diffusion models fail predictably on compositional prompts: attributes bind to the wrong objects, spatial relations invert, and multi-object scenes lose count. Recent architectures already augment CLIP with a T5 encoder precisely because CLIP's contrastive embedding loses compositional structure, yet these failures persist. We argue the binding problem is therefore not one of missing information but of misaligned information: a text encoder preserves compositional structure, but in a representation space shaped by language modelling rather than vision, and the denoising objective does not directly reward aligning the two. We show this correspondence can be supplied as an explicit training signal, that the relevant cross-modal information is concentrated in a low-rank subspace of self-supervised visual features, and that supplying it can be folded into diffusion training as a single auxiliary loss. Our method, ORCA (Orthogonal Residual Compositional Alignment), aligns the latent of a diffusion transformer with a low-rank target derived from a frozen visual encoder, through a predictor whose orthogonal basis is parameterised by a learned residual between T5 and CLIP embeddings, which provides a prompt-dependent signal for selecting the visual readout subspace. We prove that the cross-modal information recoverable at a given rank is bounded by the spectral mass of the visual encoder's covariance in the top components. Across three diffusion-transformer backbones (DiT-B/2, DiT-L/2, U-ViT-L), ORCA improves FID and GenEval over both vanilla and REPA baselines at zero inference-time cost; on DiT-L/2 it reaches FID 16.65 and GenEval 0.291 at 200K steps, exceeding the strongest 400K baseline at half the training cost, with the largest gains concentrated on attribute binding, spatial relations, and multi-object prompts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 5 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

5 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025CompAlign: Improving Compositional Text-to-Image Generation with a Complex Benchmark and Fine-Grained Feedback16 May
  2. 2024Improving Compositional Attribute Binding in Text-to-Image Generative Models via Enhanced Text Embeddings12 Jun

Other references · 3

  1. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  3. 2025Infinity and Beyond: Compositional Alignment in VAR and Diffusion T2I Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025VSC: Visual Search Compositional Text-to-Image Diffusion Model
  2. 2023Separate-and-Enhance: Compositional Finetuning for Text2Image Diffusion Models
  3. 2022Training-Free Structured Diffusion Guidance for Compositional Text-to-Image Synthesis
  4. 2024TALE: Training-free Cross-domain Image Composition via Adaptive Latent Manipulation and Energy-guided Optimization
  5. 2024Magnet: We Never Know How Text-to-Image Diffusion Models Work, Until We Learn How Vision-Language Models Function
  6. 2025CLIP is All You Need for Human-like Semantic Representations in Stable Diffusion
  7. 2026Injecting Image Guidance into Text-Conditioned Diffusion Models at Inference
  8. 2023Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero-Shot Classifiers