Do Vision-Language Models Understand Compound Nouns?
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Open-vocabulary vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP, trained using contrastive loss, have emerged as a promising new paradigm for text-to-image retrieval. However, do VLMs understand compound nouns (CNs) (e.g., lab coat) as well as they understand nouns (e.g., lab)? We curate Compun, a novel benchmark with 400 unique and commonly used CNs, to evaluate the effectiveness of VLMs in interpreting CNs. The Compun benchmark challenges a VLM for text-to-image retrieval where, given a text prompt with a CN, the task is to select the correct image that shows the CN among a pair of distractor images that show the constituent nouns that make up the CN. Next, we perform an in-depth analysis to highlight CLIPs' limited understanding of certain types of CNs. Finally, we present an alternative framework that moves beyond hand-written templates for text prompts widely used by CLIP-like models. We employ a Large Language Model to generate multiple diverse captions that include the CN as an object in the scene described by the caption. Our proposed method improves CN understanding of CLIP by 8.25% on Compun. Code and benchmark are available at: https://github.com/sonalkum/Compun
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 5 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2024.
Builds on
5 of 34 references.
References · 5
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 557
- 2023Demystifying CLIP Datacited by 265
- 2023From chocolate bunny to chocolate crocodile: Do Language Models Understand Noun Compounds?cited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025From What to How: Attributing CLIP's Latent Components Reveals Unexpected Semantic Reliancecited by 4
- 2024Seeing Syntax: Uncovering Syntactic Learning Limitations in Vision-Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Attention Guided Alignment in Efficient Vision-Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024How Vision-Language Tasks Benefit from Large Pre-trained Models: A Surveycited by 0
- 2025Attention Guided Alignment in Efficient Vision-Language Models21 Nov 2025
- 2025From What to How: Attributing CLIP's Latent Components Reveals Unexpected Semantic Reliance26 May 2025
- 2024How Vision-Language Tasks Benefit from Large Pre-trained Models: A Survey11 Dec 2024
- 2024Seeing Syntax: Uncovering Syntactic Learning Limitations in Vision-Language Models11 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Vision-Free Retrieval: Rethinking Multimodal Search with Textual Scene Descriptions
- 2025Adding simple structure at inference improves Vision-Language Compositionality
- 2025CoLLM: A Large Language Model for Composed Image Retrieval
- 2026Inference-Time Structural Reasoning for Compositional Vision-Language Understanding
- 2026Do Vision-Language Models See or Guess? Measuring and Reducing Textual-Prior Reliance with a Phrasing-Controlled Benchmark
- 2025A Multimodal Recaptioning Framework to Account for Perceptual Diversity Across Languages in Vision-Language Modeling
- 2024Constructing Multilingual Visual-Text Datasets Revealing Visual Multilingual Ability of Vision Language Models
- 2023Text encoders bottleneck compositionality in contrastive vision-language models