Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive Learning
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP
Abstract (arXiv)
Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) has become a cornerstone in vision-language representation learning, powering diverse downstream tasks and serving as the default vision backbone in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Despite its success, CLIP's dense and opaque latent representations pose significant interpretability challenges. A common assumption is that interpretability and performance are in tension: enforcing sparsity during training degrades accuracy, motivating recent post-hoc approaches such as Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs). However, these post-hoc approaches often suffer from degraded downstream performance and loss of CLIP's inherent multimodal capabilities, with most learned features remaining unimodal. We propose a simple yet effective approach that integrates sparsity directly into CLIP training, yielding representations that are both interpretable and performant. Compared to SAEs, our Sparse CLIP representations preserve strong downstream task performance, achieve superior interpretability, and retain multimodal capabilities. We show that multimodal sparse features enable straightforward semantic concept alignment and reveal training dynamics of how cross-modal knowledge emerges. Finally, as a proof of concept, we train a vision-language model on sparse CLIP representations that enables interpretable, vision-based steering capabilities. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom that interpretability requires sacrificing accuracy and demonstrate that interpretability and performance can be co-optimized, offering a promising design principle for future models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2026.
Builds on
35 of 51 references.
References · 35
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
23 more
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 326
- 2022Scaling Language-Image Pre-training via Maskingcited by 317
- 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
- 2023Demystifying CLIP Datacited by 270
- 2022CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networkscited by 147
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 115
- 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 109
- 2024Multimodal Autoregressive Pre-training of Large Vision Encoderscited by 109
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 68
- 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 60
- 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language modelscited by 59
- 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoderscited by 38
- 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spacescited by 32
- 2025Mechanistic understanding and validation of large AI models with SemanticLenscited by 29
- 2023STAIR: Learning Sparse Text and Image Representation in Grounded Tokenscited by 23
- 2025Prisma: An Open Source Toolkit for Mechanistic Interpretability in Vision and Videocited by 21
- 2024Non-negative Contrastive Learningcited by 19
- 2024Altogether: Image Captioning via Re-aligning Alt-textcited by 17
- 2025Low-Rank Adapting Models for Sparse Autoencoderscited by 7
- 2024Wasserstein Distances, Neuronal Entanglement, and Sparsitycited by 6
- 2024UniPTS: A Unified Framework for Proficient Post-Training Sparsitycited by 3
- 2024Navigating Extremes: Dynamic Sparsity in Large Output Spacescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Improved baselines for vision-language pre-training
- 2024Diffusion Feedback Helps CLIP See Better
- 2023A Closer Look at the Explainability of Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training
- 2024CLIP-PING: Boosting Lightweight Vision-Language Models with Proximus Intrinsic Neighbors Guidance
- 2024Toward a Holistic Evaluation of Robustness in CLIP Models
- 2025Post-pre-training for Modality Alignment in Vision-Language Foundation Models
- 2025HQ-CLIP: Leveraging Large Vision-Language Models to Create High-Quality Image-Text Datasets and CLIP Models
- 2022CLIP-TD: CLIP Targeted Distillation for Vision-Language Tasks