mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DeCoDe: Defer-and-Complement Decision-Making via Decoupled Concept Bottleneck Models

arXiv 2505.19220 ↗First posted 25 May 2025cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In human-AI collaboration, a central challenge is deciding whether the AI should handle a task, be deferred to a human expert, or be addressed through collaborative effort. Existing Learning to Defer approaches typically make binary choices between AI and humans, neglecting their complementary strengths. They also lack interpretability, a critical property in high-stakes scenarios where users must understand and, if necessary, correct the model's reasoning. To overcome these limitations, we propose Defer-and-Complement Decision-Making via Decoupled Concept Bottleneck Models (DeCoDe), a concept-driven framework for human-AI collaboration. DeCoDe makes strategy decisions based on human-interpretable concept representations, enhancing transparency throughout the decision process. It supports three flexible modes: autonomous AI prediction, deferral to humans, and human-AI collaborative complementarity, selected via a gating network that takes concept-level inputs and is trained using a novel surrogate loss that balances accuracy and human effort. This approach enables instance-specific, interpretable, and adaptive human-AI collaboration. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that DeCoDe significantly outperforms AI-only, human-only, and traditional deferral baselines, while maintaining strong robustness and interpretability even under noisy expert annotations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2025.

Builds on

23 of 39 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  4. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  5. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
  6. 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 271
  7. 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 233
  8. 2020Learning to Complement Humanscited by 124
  9. 2019The Algorithmic Automation Problem: Prediction, Triage, and Human Effortcited by 101
  10. 2023Who Should Predict? Exact Algorithms For Learning to Defer to Humanscited by 70
  11. 2022Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifierscited by 69
  12. 2022Learning to Defer to Multiple Experts: Consistent Surrogate Losses, Confidence Calibration, and Conformal Ensemblescited by 60
11 more
  1. 2020OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database: a large scale resource of mammography images and clinical datacited by 38
  2. 2024A Taxonomy for Human-LLM Interaction Modes: An Initial Explorationcited by 38
  3. 2023Effective Human-AI Teams via Learned Natural Language Rules and Onboardingcited by 20
  4. 2021Is Disentanglement all you need? Comparing Concept-based & Disentanglement Approachescited by 17
  5. 2024Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Multi-Path Collaborative Reactive and Reflection agentscited by 15
  6. 2023Using AI Uncertainty Quantification to Improve Human Decision-Makingcited by 11
  7. 2024Tree-Based Leakage Inspection and Control in Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 8
  8. 2024Learning to Complement and to Defer to Multiple Userscited by 7
  9. 2024Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Expertscited by 5
  10. 2023When Are Two Lists Better than One?: Benefits and Harms in Joint Decision-makingcited by 4
  11. 2025Learning to Help in Multi-Class Settingscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.