mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stable and Steerable Sparse Autoencoders with Weight Regularization

arXiv 2603.04198 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used to extract human-interpretable features from neural network activations, but their learned features can vary substantially across random seeds and training choices. To improve stability, we studied weight regularization by adding L1 or L2 penalties on encoder and decoder weights, and evaluate how regularization interacts with common SAE training defaults. On MNIST, we observe that L2 weight regularization produces a core of highly aligned features and, when combined with tied initialization and unit-norm decoder constraints, it dramatically increases cross-seed feature consistency. For TopK SAEs trained on language model activations (Pythia-70M-deduped), adding a small L2 weight penalty increased the fraction of features shared across three random seeds and roughly doubles steering success rates, while leaving the mean of automated interpretability scores essentially unchanged. Finally, in the regularized setting, activation steering success becomes better predicted by auto-interpretability scores, suggesting that regularization can align text-based feature explanations with functional controllability.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 13 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.

Builds on

13 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability12 Mar
  2. 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing23 Feb
  3. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features28 Jan
  4. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoders9 Dec
  5. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
  6. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 7

  1. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  2. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
  3. 2024Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learningcited by 67
  4. 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoderscited by 25
  5. 2024Interpretability as Compression: Reconsidering SAE Explanations of Neural Activations with MDL-SAEscited by 23
  6. 2025Sparse but Wrong: Incorrect L0 Leads to Incorrect Features in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 14
  7. 2025Attribution-Guided Distillation of Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Sanity Checks for Sparse Autoencoders: Do SAEs Beat Random Baselines?
  2. 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy
  3. 2024Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Targeted Concept Erasure Tasks
  4. 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?
  5. 2025Ensembling Sparse Autoencoders
  6. 2026Improving Robustness In Sparse Autoencoders via Masked Regularization
  7. 2026Discovering Millions of Interpretable Features with Sparse Autoencoders
  8. 2025SplInterp: Improving our Understanding and Training of Sparse Autoencoders