mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MultiDrive: A Co-Simulation Framework Bridging 2D and 3D Driving Simulation for AV Software Validation

arXiv 2505.13959 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing

Abstract (arXiv)

Scenario-based testing using simulations is a cornerstone of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) software validation. So far, developers needed to choose between low-fidelity 2D simulators to explore the scenario space efficiently, and high-fidelity 3D simulators to study relevant scenarios in more detail, thus reducing testing costs while mitigating the sim-to-real gap. This paper presents a novel framework that leverages multi-agent co-simulation and procedural scenario generation to support scenario-based testing across low- and high-fidelity simulators for the development of motion planning algorithms. Our framework limits the effort required to transition scenarios between simulators and automates experiment execution, trajectory analysis, and visualization. Experiments with a reference motion planner show that our framework uncovers discrepancies between the planner's intended and actual behavior, thus exposing weaknesses in planning assumptions under more realistic conditions. Our framework is available at: https://github.com/TUM-AVS/MultiDrive

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

12 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021A Survey on Simulators for Testing Self-Driving Cars13 Jan

Other references · 11

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  2. 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehiclescited by 493
  3. 2018Scenarios for Development, Test and Validation of Automated Vehiclescited by 48
  4. 2021Mind the Gap! A Study on the Transferability of Virtual vs Physical-world Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 37
  5. 2022A Survey on Automated Driving System Testing: Landscapes and Trendscited by 36
  6. 2024FRENETIX: A High-Performance and Modular Motion Planning Framework for Autonomous Drivingcited by 14
  7. 2024LeGEND: A Top-Down Approach to Scenario Generation of Autonomous Driving Systems Assisted by Large Language Modelscited by 9
  8. 2024CARLA-Autoware-Bridge: Facilitating Autonomous Driving Research with a Unified Framework for Simulation and Module Developmentcited by 5
  9. 2020Overview of Tools Supporting Planning for Automated Drivingcited by 3
  10. 2024Investigating Driving Interactions: A Robust Multi-Agent Simulation Framework for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 3
  11. 2020An Open-Source Scenario Architect for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PlannerForge: LLM Agents for Scenario-Based Testing of Motion Planners in Autonomous Driving
  2. 2026WM-Cov: Test Adequacy for Interactive World-Model-Style Autonomous Driving Simulation
  3. 2024Multimodal Large Language Model Driven Scenario Testing for Autonomous Vehicles
  4. 2024Generating Critical Scenarios for Testing Automated Driving Systems
  5. 2026From Virtual Environments to Real-World Trials: Emerging Trends in Autonomous Driving
  6. 2024CaDRE: Controllable and Diverse Generation of Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios using Real-World Trajectories
  7. 2026Teach-to-Crash: A Closed-Loop Student-Teacher LLM Framework for Collision-Inducing Test Scenario Generation
  8. 2026ScenePilot: Controllable Boundary-Driven Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving