LeGEND: A Top-Down Approach to Scenario Generation of Autonomous Driving Systems Assisted by Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous driving systems (ADS) are safety-critical and require comprehensive testing before their deployment on public roads. While existing testing approaches primarily aim at the criticality of scenarios, they often overlook the diversity of the generated scenarios that is also important to reflect system defects in different aspects. To bridge the gap, we propose LeGEND, that features a top-down fashion of scenario generation: it starts with abstract functional scenarios, and then steps downwards to logical and concrete scenarios, such that scenario diversity can be controlled at the functional level. However, unlike logical scenarios that can be formally described, functional scenarios are often documented in natural languages (e.g., accident reports) and thus cannot be precisely parsed and processed by computers. To tackle that issue, LeGEND leverages the recent advances of large language models (LLMs) to transform textual functional scenarios to formal logical scenarios. To mitigate the distraction of useless information in functional scenario description, we devise a two-phase transformation that features the use of an intermediate language; consequently, we adopt two LLMs in LeGEND, one for extracting information from functional scenarios, the other for converting the extracted information to formal logical scenarios. We experimentally evaluate LeGEND on Apollo, an industry-grade ADS from Baidu. Evaluation results show that LeGEND can effectively identify critical scenarios, and compared to baseline approaches, LeGEND exhibits evident superiority in diversity of generated scenarios. Moreover, we also demonstrate the advantages of our two-phase transformation framework, and the accuracy of the adopted LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.
9 papers.
- 2025Foundation Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey on Scenario Generation and Scenario Analysiscited by 37
- 2025Survey of GenAI for Automotive Software Development: From Requirements to Executable Codecited by 5
- 2026Chat2Scenic: An Iterative RAG-Based Framework for Scenario Generation in Autonomous Drivingcited by 1
- 2025MultiDrive: A Co-Simulation Framework Bridging 2D and 3D Driving Simulation for AV Software Validationcited by 0
- 2025Search-Based Software Engineering and AI Foundation Models: Current Landscape and Future Roadmapcited by 0
- 2026SPHINX: First Explain, Then Explorecited by 0
- 2026From Driving Videos to Simulatable Scenarioscited by 0
- 2026TrafficAlign: Aligning Large Language Models for Traffic Scenario Generationcited by 0
- 2026Think Inside the Chunk: RegulaRAG for Regulation-Compliant Scenario Generation using LLMs: A Case Study of UN Regulation No. 152cited by 0
- 2026Think Inside the Chunk: RegulaRAG for Regulation-Compliant Scenario Generation using LLMs: A Case Study of UN Regulation No. 15217 Aug 2026
- 2026Chat2Scenic: An Iterative RAG-Based Framework for Scenario Generation in Autonomous Driving15 Jul 2026
- 2026TrafficAlign: Aligning Large Language Models for Traffic Scenario Generation27 Jun 2026
- 2026From Driving Videos to Simulatable Scenarios20 Jun 2026
- 2026SPHINX: First Explain, Then Explore16 Jun 2026
- 2025Survey of GenAI for Automotive Software Development: From Requirements to Executable Code20 Jul 2025
- 2025Foundation Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey on Scenario Generation and Scenario Analysis13 Jun 2025
- 2025Search-Based Software Engineering and AI Foundation Models: Current Landscape and Future Roadmap26 May 2025
- 2025MultiDrive: A Co-Simulation Framework Bridging 2D and 3D Driving Simulation for AV Software Validation20 May 2025