mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BLEUBERI: BLEU is a surprisingly effective reward for instruction following

arXiv 2505.11080 ↗First posted 16 May 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 17

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Reward models are central to aligning LLMs with human preferences, but they are costly to train, requiring large-scale human-labeled preference data and powerful pretrained LLM backbones. Meanwhile, the increasing availability of high-quality synthetic instruction-following datasets raises the question: can simpler, reference-based metrics serve as viable alternatives to reward models during RL-based alignment? In this paper, we show first that BLEU, a basic string-matching metric, surprisingly matches strong reward models in agreement with human preferences on general instruction-following datasets. Based on this insight, we develop BLEUBERI, a method that first identifies challenging instructions and then applies Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) using BLEU directly as the reward function. We demonstrate that BLEUBERI-trained models are competitive with models trained via reward model-guided RL across four challenging instruction-following benchmarks and three different base language models. A human evaluation further supports that the quality of BLEUBERI model outputs is on par with those from reward model-aligned models. Moreover, BLEUBERI models generate outputs that are more factually grounded than competing methods. Overall, we show that given access to high-quality reference outputs (easily obtained via existing instruction-following datasets or synthetic data generation), string matching-based metrics are cheap yet effective proxies for reward models during alignment. We release our code and data at https://github.com/lilakk/BLEUBERI.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 50 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.

Builds on

50 of 76 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothing12 Jun
  2. 2023Verbosity Bias in Preference Labeling by Large Language Models16 Oct
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 47

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  6. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  7. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  8. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
  9. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
  10. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
  11. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 547
  12. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
35 more
  1. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
  2. 2025RAGEN: Understanding Self-Evolution in LLM Agents via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 386
  3. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 378
  4. 2016How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 356
  5. 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 340
  6. 2024Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biasescited by 323
  7. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 295
  8. 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 291
  9. 2024To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoningcited by 263
  10. 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 218
  11. 2025SFT or RL? An Early Investigation into Training R1-Like Reasoning Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 212
  12. 2019Neural Text Summarization: A Critical Evaluationcited by 189
  13. 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 159
  14. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 158
  15. 2020A Distributional Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 119
  16. 2024VERISCORE: Evaluating the factuality of verifiable claims in long-form text generationcited by 117
  17. 2023A Critical Evaluation of Evaluations for Long-form Question Answeringcited by 111
  18. 2020GLUCOSE: GeneraLized and COntextualized Story Explanationscited by 86
  19. 2019Beyond BLEU: Training Neural Machine Translation with Semantic Similaritycited by 84
  20. 2022On Reinforcement Learning and Distribution Matching for Fine-Tuning Language Models with no Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 82
  21. 2018A Study of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 74
  22. 2022Out of the BLEU: how should we assess quality of the Code Generation models?cited by 65
  23. 2024Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizingcited by 49
  24. 2022Exploring Document-Level Literary Machine Translation with Parallel Paragraphs from World Literaturecited by 45
  25. 2025Phi-4-Mini-Reasoning: Exploring the Limits of Small Reasoning Language Models in Mathcited by 44
  26. 2025Med-RLVR: Emerging Medical Reasoning from a 3B base model via reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  27. 2024PARIKSHA: A Large-Scale Investigation of Human-LLM Evaluator Agreement on Multilingual and Multi-Cultural Datacited by 37
  28. 2025Learning to Reason for Long-Form Story Generationcited by 34
  29. 2021Revisiting the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 33
  30. 2024Analyzing the Performance of Large Language Models on Code Summarizationcited by 19
  31. 2019Template-free Data-to-Text Generation of Finnish Sports Newscited by 9
  32. 2025LExT: Towards Evaluating Trustworthiness of Natural Language Explanationscited by 9
  33. 2023Task-oriented Document-Grounded Dialog Systems by HLTPR@RWTH for DSTC9 and DSTC10cited by 4
  34. 2019On conducting better validation studies of automatic metrics in natural language generation evaluationcited by 1
  35. 2021Exploring Supervised and Unsupervised Rewards in Machine Translationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 11.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergycited by 214
  2. 2025Language Models that Think, Chat Bettercited by 24
  3. 2026Advancing General-Purpose Reasoning Models with Modular Gradient Surgerycited by 9
  4. 2025GrAInS: Gradient-based Attribution for Inference-Time Steering of LLMs and VLMscited by 6
  5. 2026From Verifiable Dot to Reward Chain: Harnessing Verifiable Reference-based Rewards for Reinforcement Learning of Open-ended Generationcited by 6
  6. 2026Retrieval as Generation: A Unified Framework with Self-Triggered Information Planningcited by 5
  7. 2025Advancing Speech Understanding in Speech-Aware Language Models with GRPOcited by 4
  8. 2025Locate-Then-Examine: Grounded Region Reasoning Improves Detection of AI-Generated Imagescited by 4
  9. 2025Improving Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Systems with Group Similarity Rewardscited by 2
  10. 2026Small Reward Models via Backward Inferencecited by 2
  11. 2026Precision over Diversity: High-Precision Reward Generalizes to Robust Instruction Followingcited by 1
  12. 2026References Improve LLM Alignment in Non-Verifiable Domainscited by 1
5 more
  1. 2026RLAR: An Agentic Reward System for Multi-task Reinforcement Learning on Large Language Modelscited by 1
  2. 2026Fast-Slow Thinking RM: Efficient Integration of Scalar and Generative Reward Modelscited by 1
  3. 2026Learning to Route Languages for Multilingual Policy Optimizationcited by 1
  4. 2026Think Before you Write: QA-Guided Reasoning for Character Descriptions in Bookscited by 0
  5. 2026What do Reward Models Memorize?cited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation
  2. 2024ROSE: A Reward-Oriented Data Selection Framework for LLM Task-Specific Instruction Tuning
  3. 2024A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following
  4. 2025Beyond Monolithic Rewards: A Hybrid and Multi-Aspect Reward Optimization for MLLM Alignment
  5. 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
  6. 2025A Survey on Progress in LLM Alignment from the Perspective of Reward Design
  7. 2024Align2LLaVA: Cascaded Human and Large Language Model Preference Alignment for Multi-modal Instruction Curation
  8. 2024Elephant in the Room: Unveiling the Impact of Reward Model Quality in Alignment